MedPath

Chlorhexidine Versus Povidone-Iodine for Prevention of Epidural Needle Contamination in the Parturient

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Asepsis
Analgesia, Epidural
Anesthesia, Epidural
Interventions
Registration Number
NCT00223002
Lead Sponsor
University of Saskatchewan
Brief Summary

Infection after epidural catheter placement is fortunately rare. When it does happen, the affected person can become seriously ill.

This study examines which skin disinfectant, chlorhexidine or povidone-iodine, decreases the number of bacteria that can be grown from the skin washed with each disinfectant prior to placing an epidural catheter for pain control in labour.

Detailed Description

The use of chlorhexidine for skin asepsis for the placement of intravascular catheters is known to decrease the incidence of central line colonization and blood stream infection when compared to the use of povidone-iodine. While the development of an infectious complication following spinal or epidural analgesia, such as epidural abscess or meningitis, is fortunately rare, when it does happen, there can be devastating consequences for the affected individual. The low frequency of infection makes a trial with an endpoint of clinical infection not feasible, however a reduction in skin and needle contamination following attempts at asepsis should reduce the risk of infectious complication. Ongoing work by the authors is examining the skin culture rates following randomized standardized skin disinfection. The purpose of this randomized trial is to compare needle culture rates to further assess effectiveness of skin disinfection following a standardized skin preparation with either povidone-iodine or chlorhexidine in pregnant women requesting lumbar epidural pain relief in labour.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
400
Inclusion Criteria
  • Parturients requesting lumbar labour epidural analgesia while investigator is assigned to the Obstetrical Anesthesia Service
Exclusion Criteria
  • Known allergy to either skin disinfectant
  • Requirement to receive antibiotics prior to placement of lumbar epidural catheter
  • Immunosuppression of the participant

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
1ChlorhexidinePI
2ChlorhexidineChlorohex
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
culture-positive rate of epidural needles processed by microbiology labimmediate
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Royal University Hospital

🇨🇦

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath