Is There a More Affordable Method for Training in Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation - CPR? Comparing the Effectiveness of Standard CPR Manikins and CPR Pillows.
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- Enrolling By Invitation
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 128
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Hand Position
研究概览
简要总结
Pillows can be used to facilitate safe and effective learning and as a cheaper and more accessible alternative to manikins or computer-based methods for CPR training by non-healthcare professionals. The purpose of this study was to compare the effectiveness of pillows and manikins in CPR training.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Na
- 干预模型
- Single Group
- 主要目的
- Supportive Care
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Being over 18 years of age
排除标准
- •No physical impairment is required to perform CPR.
结局指标
主要结局
Hand Position
时间窗: 0. day (The parameter will be evaluated immediately after training.)
The suitability of the compression area will be evaluated by the instructor.
Cardiac compression number
时间窗: 0. day (The parameter will be evaluated immediately after my ethics.)
The number of compressions applied by the participants in one minute will be calculated.
Compression depth
时间窗: 0. day (The parameter will be evaluated immediately after training.)
Cardiac compression depth will be measured in cm.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Aysegul Gunes
Health Science Faculty Lecturer (PhD. RN.)
University of Beykent