Improving a Bile Duct Drainage Procedure in Patients With Inoperable Cancer Blocking the Bile Ducts: Comparing Two Types of Endoscopically Placed Internal Stents to Prevent Blockage of a Lumen Apposing Metal Stent
- Conditions
- Malignant Biliary ObstructionAdvanced Pancreatic Cancer and CholangiocarcinomaInoperable Malignant Biliary ObstructionLumen Apposing Metal Stents
- Registration Number
- NCT07115420
- Lead Sponsor
- Waikato Hospital
- Brief Summary
This study looks at the best way to treat bile duct blockage in people with advanced cancer that cannot be removed by surgery. A blocked bile duct can cause serious symptoms like yellowing of the skin (jaundice), infection, and pain.
A common procedure called ERCP sometimes doesn't work in these patients. A newer method called EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) uses internal ultrasound to place a special metal tube (called a LAMS) to allow bile to drain. However, over time this stent can still become blocked.
To reduce this risk, doctors can place a second stent inside the first. This study is comparing two types of these second stents:
* A plastic stent (double pigtail stent or DPS)
* A metal stent (fully covered self-expanding metal stent or FCSEMS)
The study will include patients at Waikato Hospital. After the first stent is placed, they will be randomly assigned to receive either a DPS or FCSEMS. Patients will be followed for 6 months to see how well the stents work.
The aim is to find out which approach keeps the bile duct open longer and reduces the need for further procedures or hospitalisation, helping improve care and comfort for people with advanced cancer
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- NOT_YET_RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 100
- Age ≥18 years.
- Radiologically or histologically proven malignant distal bile duct obstruction with unresectable or metastatic disease, including those who have already failed ERCP
- Indication for biliary drainage with presence of obstructive jaundice biochemically and dilated biliary system on imaging.
- Informed consent provided.
- Common bile duct (CBD) size of at least 12mm on EUS imaging
- Previous biliary stenting or surgery precluding EUS-CDS.
- Inability to provide informed consent.
- Pregnancy.
- Significant coagulopathy that is not correctable.
- Futility of intervention e.g. pre-terminal patients
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the incidence of stent dysfunction (defined as recurrent jaundice and/or cholangitis) in patients with malignant biliary obstruction receiving FCSEMS vs DPS stent-in-stent through LAMS 26 weeks
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Technical success of LAMS placement. 1 day Whether the LAMS stent is able to be successfully placed in the procedure
Re-intervention rate 26 weeks blockage of the LAMS stent requiring repeat procedure(s) as evidenced by clinical, biochemical evidence, and/or radiological evidence of biliary obstruction
Technical success of second stent-in-stent placement 1 day Whether the second stent (either FCSEMS or DPS) is able to be placed successfully
Clinical success of biliary drainage (evaluated at weeks 1, 2, 4, 12, and 26 using bilirubin and liver enzymes). weeks 1, 2, 4, 12, and 26 whether biliary drainage has been successful based on biochemical blood tests
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Waikato Hospital, Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand Waikato
🇳🇿Hamilton, New Zealand
Waikato Hospital, Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand Waikato🇳🇿Hamilton, New ZealandFrank Weilert, BSc, MBBCh, FRACP and FASGEContact+6421417473frank.weilert@waikatodhb.health.nzTara Fox, MBChBSub InvestigatorNick Dalkie, MBChBSub InvestigatorJerry YL ChinSub InvestigatorPaul FockensSub Investigator