MedPath

Improving a Bile Duct Drainage Procedure in Patients With Inoperable Cancer Blocking the Bile Ducts: Comparing Two Types of Endoscopically Placed Internal Stents to Prevent Blockage of a Lumen Apposing Metal Stent

Not Applicable
Not yet recruiting
Conditions
Malignant Biliary Obstruction
Advanced Pancreatic Cancer and Cholangiocarcinoma
Inoperable Malignant Biliary Obstruction
Lumen Apposing Metal Stents
Registration Number
NCT07115420
Lead Sponsor
Waikato Hospital
Brief Summary

This study looks at the best way to treat bile duct blockage in people with advanced cancer that cannot be removed by surgery. A blocked bile duct can cause serious symptoms like yellowing of the skin (jaundice), infection, and pain.

A common procedure called ERCP sometimes doesn't work in these patients. A newer method called EUS-guided choledochoduodenostomy (EUS-CDS) uses internal ultrasound to place a special metal tube (called a LAMS) to allow bile to drain. However, over time this stent can still become blocked.

To reduce this risk, doctors can place a second stent inside the first. This study is comparing two types of these second stents:

* A plastic stent (double pigtail stent or DPS)

* A metal stent (fully covered self-expanding metal stent or FCSEMS)

The study will include patients at Waikato Hospital. After the first stent is placed, they will be randomly assigned to receive either a DPS or FCSEMS. Patients will be followed for 6 months to see how well the stents work.

The aim is to find out which approach keeps the bile duct open longer and reduces the need for further procedures or hospitalisation, helping improve care and comfort for people with advanced cancer

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
NOT_YET_RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria
  • Age ≥18 years.
  • Radiologically or histologically proven malignant distal bile duct obstruction with unresectable or metastatic disease, including those who have already failed ERCP
  • Indication for biliary drainage with presence of obstructive jaundice biochemically and dilated biliary system on imaging.
  • Informed consent provided.
  • Common bile duct (CBD) size of at least 12mm on EUS imaging
Exclusion Criteria
  • Previous biliary stenting or surgery precluding EUS-CDS.
  • Inability to provide informed consent.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Significant coagulopathy that is not correctable.
  • Futility of intervention e.g. pre-terminal patients

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
To compare the incidence of stent dysfunction (defined as recurrent jaundice and/or cholangitis) in patients with malignant biliary obstruction receiving FCSEMS vs DPS stent-in-stent through LAMS26 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Technical success of LAMS placement.1 day

Whether the LAMS stent is able to be successfully placed in the procedure

Re-intervention rate26 weeks

blockage of the LAMS stent requiring repeat procedure(s) as evidenced by clinical, biochemical evidence, and/or radiological evidence of biliary obstruction

Technical success of second stent-in-stent placement1 day

Whether the second stent (either FCSEMS or DPS) is able to be placed successfully

Clinical success of biliary drainage (evaluated at weeks 1, 2, 4, 12, and 26 using bilirubin and liver enzymes).weeks 1, 2, 4, 12, and 26

whether biliary drainage has been successful based on biochemical blood tests

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Waikato Hospital, Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand Waikato

🇳🇿

Hamilton, New Zealand

Waikato Hospital, Te Whatu Ora Health New Zealand Waikato
🇳🇿Hamilton, New Zealand
Frank Weilert, BSc, MBBCh, FRACP and FASGE
Contact
+6421417473
frank.weilert@waikatodhb.health.nz
Tara Fox, MBChB
Sub Investigator
Nick Dalkie, MBChB
Sub Investigator
Jerry YL Chin
Sub Investigator
Paul Fockens
Sub Investigator

MedPath

Empowering clinical research with data-driven insights and AI-powered tools.

© 2025 MedPath, Inc. All rights reserved.