Gas Embolism during Hysteroscopic Surgery Detected by Esophageal Echocardiography: A comparison using two different electrocautery cutting techniques.
Not yet recruiting
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Pending
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 42
Inclusion Criteria
Healthy patients (ASA classification 1 or 2) scheduled for Trans Cervical Myoma resection (TCR-M) or Trans Cervical endometrium resection (TCR-E) will be included.
Exclusion Criteria
Exclusion criteria include age younger than 18 or higher than 70 and a history of pulmonary embolism, cardiac disease or oesophageal disease.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage venous or paradoxical emboli
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Duration of emboli observation
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What are the molecular mechanisms of gas embolism detection using transesophageal echocardiography in hysteroscopic surgery?
How does bipolar diathermia compare to monopolar diathermia in preventing paradoxical gas embolism during hysteroscopy?
Are there specific biomarkers associated with increased risk of venous gas embolism in gynecological procedures?
What adverse events are commonly reported in hysteroscopic surgeries utilizing electrocautery techniques?
What are the current standard-of-care practices for managing gas embolism in minimally invasive gynecological surgery?