Analgesic and Respiratory Outcomes in Patients Receiving Continuous Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block Compared to Continuous Preperitoneal Catheter Wound Infusion After Upper Abdominal Surgery
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Abdominal Cancer Surgery
- Interventions
- Procedure: Erector Spinae Plane blockProcedure: Continuous Wound Infusion
- Registration Number
- NCT05121987
- Lead Sponsor
- South Egypt Cancer Institute
- Brief Summary
We aim to compare the postoperative analgesic and respiratory outcomes in patients receiving continuous bupivacaine infusion via bilateral erector spinae catheters versus preperitoneal catheters in upper abdominal surgeries.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- UNKNOWN
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
Inclusion Criteria
- ASA physical status I-II, weighing 50-90 Kg with Body Mass Index (BMI) 18.5- 29.9 kg/m2
Exclusion Criteria
- ASA physical status ≥III, pregnancy, body mass index >30 kg/m2, preoperative opioid consumption, patient's refusal and contraindications of the use of spirometry or either of the truncal blocks under the study including; respiratory, cardiac, neurological, mental or coagulation disorders.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Erector spinae plane block Erector Spinae Plane block - Continuous wound infusion Continuous Wound Infusion -
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Total Morphine consumption 48 hours
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method