MedPath

Analgesic and Respiratory Outcomes in Patients Receiving Continuous Bilateral Erector Spinae Plane Block Compared to Continuous Preperitoneal Catheter Wound Infusion After Upper Abdominal Surgery

Not Applicable
Conditions
Abdominal Cancer Surgery
Interventions
Procedure: Erector Spinae Plane block
Procedure: Continuous Wound Infusion
Registration Number
NCT05121987
Lead Sponsor
South Egypt Cancer Institute
Brief Summary

We aim to compare the postoperative analgesic and respiratory outcomes in patients receiving continuous bupivacaine infusion via bilateral erector spinae catheters versus preperitoneal catheters in upper abdominal surgeries.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
60
Inclusion Criteria
  • ASA physical status I-II, weighing 50-90 Kg with Body Mass Index (BMI) 18.5- 29.9 kg/m2
Exclusion Criteria
  • ASA physical status ≥III, pregnancy, body mass index >30 kg/m2, preoperative opioid consumption, patient's refusal and contraindications of the use of spirometry or either of the truncal blocks under the study including; respiratory, cardiac, neurological, mental or coagulation disorders.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Erector spinae plane blockErector Spinae Plane block-
Continuous wound infusionContinuous Wound Infusion-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Total Morphine consumption48 hours
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath