MedPath

Ridge Preservation Comparing a Polylactic Acid Membrane vs. an Acellular Dermal Matrix Membrane

Phase 4
Completed
Conditions
Ridge Preservation
Interventions
Procedure: Acellular dermal matrix membrane
Procedure: Polylactic acid membrane
Registration Number
NCT02152215
Lead Sponsor
University of Louisville
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and histologic outcomes for acellular dermal matrix and resorbable membranes to determine if either provides a significant therapeutic advantage.

Detailed Description

The control subjects will receive a bone graft in the extraction socket, plus an additional bone graft on the outside socket wall covered by a bioabsorbable membrane made of polylactic acid and a citric acid ester. The test subjects will receive same type and technique of bone graft with a the acellular dermal matrix membrane to cover the bone graft. The membrane the patients receive will be randomly assigned using a coin toss: heads will be assigned to the test group while tails will be assigned for controls. The objective is to determine if at 4 months the width and height of the jaw bone and also the soft tissue thickness where the tooth was extracted has increased, decreased or remained the same. Also the amount of patients own newly formed bone will be determined by microscopic examination of a core of jaw bone that will be obtained from the site of implant placement immediately before the implant is placed (the implant is not considered part of the study).

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
22
Inclusion Criteria
  • Have one non-molar tooth requiring extraction that will be replaced by a dental implant. The site must be bordered by at least one tooth.
  • Healthy male or female who is at least 18 years old.
  • Patients must sign an informed consent approved by the University of Louisville Human Studies Committee.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients with debilitating systemic diseases, or diseases that have a clinically significant effect on the periodontium.
  • Presence or history of osteonecrosis of jaws.
  • Patients who are currently taking IV bisphosphonates or who had IV treatment with bisphosphonates irrespective of duration.
  • Patients who have been treated with oral bisphosphonates for more than three years.
  • Patients with an allergy to any material or medication used in the study.
  • Patients who need prophylactic antibiotics.
  • Previous head and neck radiation therapy.
  • Chemotherapy in the previous 12 months.
  • Patients on long term NSAID or steroid therapy.
  • Pregnant patients.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Acellular dermal matrix membraneAcellular dermal matrix membraneAn acellular dermal matrix membrane will be used as a barrier between the osseous graft and the soft tissue flap.
Polylactic acid membranePolylactic acid membraneA polylactic acid membrane will be used as a barrier between the osseous graft and the soft tissue flap.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Change in crestal osseous width4 month

Horizontal post-extraction ridge measurements at the mid-defect alveolar crest and 5 mm apical taken with a caliper.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percent osseous tissue4 months post-treatment

A trephine core will be harvested at 4 months. Following histologic processing the osseous core will be classified into percent vital bone, nonvital bone and trabecular space.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Graduate Periodontics Clinic, School of Dentistry, University of Louisville

🇺🇸

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath