Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT06971653
NCT06971653CompletedNot Applicable

Piezoelectric Versus Conventional Surgical Approaches in Third Molar Removal: A Focus on Pain, Comfort, and Patient Satisfaction

Ege University0 sites60 target enrollmentStarted: January 1, 2012Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
60
Primary Endpoint
Postoperative pain with Routine and Piezoelectric Surgery

Study Overview

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of piezoelectric surgery on postoperative pain, comfort and patient satisfaction with conventional bur method applied in surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars.

The main question it aims to answer is:

Is piezoelectric surgery effective on reducing pain and increasing comfort and patient satisfaction in impacted third molar surgery? Pain levels were assessed using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and patient satisfaction was measured with functional evaluations conducted on the 1st, 3rd, and 7th postoperative days.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
Single (Participant)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
20 Years to 40 Years (Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Patients with mesioangular, distoangular, vertical or horizontal, fully impacted and fully bone retained impacted lower wisdom teeth
  • •Patients without any systemic disease
  • •Patients who have been informed about the duration, purpose and requirements of the study and who have signed the informed consent form voluntarily.

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Patients with any systemic contraindication, infection in the area of the tooth to be extracted, anamnesis of sensitivity to paracetamol derivatives or aspirin, pregnant or breastfeeding patients, and patients using antibiotics or anti-inflammatory drugs in the last 3 weeks
  • •In addition, smokers or alcohol addicts were not included in the study.

Arms & Interventions

30 patients in the piezoelectric surgery group

Experimental

Intervention: piezoelectric surgery (Procedure)

30 patients in the conventional surgery group

Experimental

Intervention: conventional surgery (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Postoperative pain with Routine and Piezoelectric Surgery

Time Frame: The postoperative outcomes including pain are clinically assessed at different-time intervals (6th and 12th hours after the operation, 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 7th days after the operation).

The primary outcome measure is postoperative pain with Routine and Piezoelectric Surgery in bilateral impacted third molar. Postoperative pain is assessed using the numbered and visual pain scale. Patients are asked to mark the pain they felt on the scale days after the operation.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Chewing, Swallowing and Speaking Functions with Routine and Piezoelectric Surgery(The postoperative outcomes including chewing, swallowing and speaking are clinically assessed at different-time intervals (1st, 2nd, 3rd, 4th, 5th, 6th and 7th days postoperative days).)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Mert Zeytinoğlu

Assoc. Prof. Dr.

Ege University

Similar Trials

Effect of Piezoelectric Surgery on Pain,... | Clinical Trial