Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT02786914
NCT02786914UnknownNot Applicable

Nut Cross-Reactivity - ACuiring Knowledge for Elimination Recommendations (NUT-CRACKER) Study

Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center1 site in 1 country250 target enrollmentStarted: April 2016Last updated:
Conditions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Enrollment
250
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
Number of patients with positive food challenge to tree-nuts and sesame

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Patients with suspected tree-nut or sesame allergy based on sensitization on skin-prick tests (SPT), will be assessed for allergy using component analysis and basophil activation test (BAT) and entered into oral immunotherapy (OIT). Component analysis and BAT will be repeated after completion of OIT. Patients with tree-nut or sesame allergy treated with the standard of care of elimination diet will serve as controls

Detailed Description

Patients will be recruited from the pool of patients referred to the investigators center for evaluation of food allergy. For each tree-nut (walnut, pecan, cashew, pistachio, hazelnut or almond) evaluated, 30 patients (ages 4-45 years old), with allergy to at least one tree-nut will be recruited from the database pool referred to above. Skin prick tests (SPT) using standardized 10 mg/ml tree-nut extracts, and BAT will be performed for all suspected allergens. Sera will be taken and sent to ThermoFisher for IgE and IgG4 binding analysis to purified components. Open OFCs will be performed for each tree-nut, unless clinically contraindicated. The results of the OFC will form the basis to determine the sensitivity and specificity of the component testing. Similarly, 40 patients with suspected sesame allergy will be administered SPT and component analysis for sesame, with correlations to OFC.

The investigators will also utilize BAT to directly test whether the identified purified components are sufficient to elicit reactivity. This objective can be met by either utilizing saved patient sera on naive basophils or directly on a subsequently obtained blood sample from the patient. For patients enrolling in OIT (secondary objective), sera will also be taken after completion of the therapeutic regimen, and IgE as well as IgG4 binding to the same components will be assessed and compared to pre-OIT results.

4.2 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS AND METHODS

4.3 Patients will be grouped by OFC their allergy status result for each tree-nut (patients with a documented IgE-mediated reaction in the previous year or a positive OFC vs. patients with regular consumption of the index food or a negative OFC). Descriptive statistics (proportions for categorical variables, means or medians and standard deviations or inter-quartile range for continuous variables) will be reported for all key participant variables, including baseline and demographic characteristics, SPT, BAT and component testing results.

For the primary objective, the sensitivity and specificity of the diagnostic tests (wheal for SPT, and CD63 induction for BAT) and IgE/IgG4 binding to the purified components in predicting OFC results allergy will be compared by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis. To this end, the investigators will evaluate molecular allergens singly or in groups for their predictive utilities.

Study Design

Study Type
Observational
Observational Model
Cohort
Time Perspective
Prospective

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
4 Years to 45 Years (Child, Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients aged 4-45 years old, with a positive SPT to tree-nuts (walnut, pecan, cashew, pistachio, hazelnut or almond) and/or sesame, and either a history of a reaction in the past year, a positive OFC, or patients refraining from tree-nut consumption.

Exclusion Criteria

  • A history of other numerous chronic inflammatory diseases, including inflammatory bowel disease and other autoimmune diseases.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Number of patients with positive food challenge to tree-nuts and sesame

Time Frame: 1 year

Determining the best diagnostic method that would predict a positive vs. negative oral food challenge in food sensitized patients

Secondary Outcomes

  • Number of patients with decreased component reactivity for a particular tree-nut and for sesame following OIT(2.5 years)
  • Number of patients with decreased component cross reactivity for a particular tree-nut and for sesame following OIT(2.5 years)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other Gov
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Predictors of Positive Food Challenge | Clinical Trial