Assessment of the Contribution of Hypnosis in the Tolerance of the Bronchoscopy
Trial Snapshot
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Status
- Active, not recruiting
- Enrollment
- 113
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Assessment of timing change of endoscopy
Study Overview
Brief Summary
Bronchoscopy is an examination performed routinely in pulmonology. This exam is considered as uncomfortable by nearly 60% of patients, especially due to respiratory blocking sensation, cough and nausea it causes, despite the use of a local anesthetic. Conversely, this examination is rarely performed under general anesthesia in hospitals in France, because it lengthens the duration of the procedure, increases its cost and can be dangerous for the respiratory failure patient.
Hypnosis is an altered state of consciousness between wakefulness and sleep, which can cause the patient to ignore the reality in which he is focusing his attention on his imagination, reducing his anxiety, his painful or unpleasant perceptions and their memorization.
The hypnosis benefit has already been evaluated in the control of pain and anxiety in many medical situations, surgical, obstetric and dental. In endoscopy, the results are mixed. In bronchoscopy, hypnosis has, to our knowledge, not been evaluated.
In a preliminary study in the endoscopy unit of the Hospital Saint Joseph, involving 66 patients, investigators showed that bronchoscopy was poorly tolerated in more than half of patients and that this poor tolerance was correlated to the level anxiety of patients, but 75% of patients surveyed would prefer the waning redo the examination in the same conditions if their health required it, rather than using a general anesthetic. Investigators then hypothesized that hypnosis would improve tolerance bronchoscopy under local anesthesia, without the need for general anesthesia.
Detailed Description
Primary objective:
To compare the safety of bronchoscopy performed under local anesthesia and hypnosis to that performed under local anesthesia alone.
Secondary objectives:
- Self-assessment of pain, difficulty breathing, coughing and sensation of nausea experienced by the patient.
- Straight-tolerance assessment of the review by the endoscopist.
- Evaluation of the quality of implementation of the review by the endoscopist.
- Evaluation of the amount of local anesthetic used during the examination.
- Measure the length of the review.
Development of the study:
Study Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Allocation
- Randomized
- Intervention Model
- Parallel
- Primary Purpose
- Health Services Research
- Masking
- Single (Investigator)
Eligibility Criteria
- Ages
- 18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
- Sex
- All
- Accepts Healthy Volunteers
- No
Inclusion Criteria
- •Before performing a bronchoscopy under his medical care
- •No opposition to participate in the study
Exclusion Criteria
- •Poor understanding of the French language
- •major hearing impairment
- •severe cognitive or psychiatric disorders
Arms & Interventions
Examination under hypnosis in addition to local anesthesia
Patients will have hypnosis add-on local anesthesia
Intervention: hypnosis (Procedure)
Examination under local anesthesia
Patients will receive a local anesthesia only without hypnosis
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Assessment of timing change of endoscopy
Time Frame: At Day 0, Time laps Start at the input of the endoscopy suite and stop when the output of the endoscopy suite
Anxiety Questionnaire HAD (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale)
Time Frame: At Day 0 within 30 minutes after the exam
Secondary Outcomes
No secondary outcomes reported
