Comparison of BIS monitoring vs non-BIS monitoring to guide propofol sedation in Endoscopic ULtrasound procedure: A prospective study
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: K87- Disorders of gallbladder, biliarytract and pancreas in diseases classified elsewhere
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2023/07/054958
- Lead Sponsor
- ILBS, new delhi
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Adult patients (18-70 years),ASA grade I -II undergoing EUS procedure at the Institute of Liver and Biliary Sciences(ILBS) New Delhi.
Exclusion Criteria
Patient refusal
Chronic sedative or opioid analgesic use
Known allergy to propofol
Uncontrolled Hypertension
Pregnant patients
Cirrhosis
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Comparison of incidence of desaturation during the EUS procedure each in BIS and non-BIS monitoring groups. <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>Timepoint: At every 5 mins during the procedure till it is over <br/ ><br> <br/ ><br>
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method <br/ ><br>Comparison of incidence of hypotension in both BIS and non-BIS groups <br/ ><br>Timepoint: At every 5 mins till end of procedure;comparison of incidence of apnea episodes in both the BIS nad non-BIS groups.Timepoint: At every 5 mins till procedure is over;comparison of incidence of arrythmia in both the groupsTimepoint: At every 5 mins till procedure is over;comparison of recovery time (Aldrete score8) in BIS vs non-BIS groups.Timepoint: At the end of procedure;comparison of total dose of propofol consumption in BIS vs non- BIS groupsTimepoint: At the end of procedure;operators satisfaction score as good, ok or difficult in BIS vs non-BIS groupsTimepoint: At the end of procedure