MedPath

Validation of a Treadmill Walking Test to Discriminate Neurogenic Claudication From Vascular Claudication

Completed
Conditions
Spinal Stenosis Lumbar
Low Back Pain
Peripheral Artery Disease
Claudication
Interventions
Diagnostic Test: Treadmill walking test
Registration Number
NCT04058171
Lead Sponsor
Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières
Brief Summary

The first aim of this study was to elaborate and validate a treadmill walking test that would help discriminate between neurogenic claudication from vascular claudication. The second objective of this study is to determine if the treadmill walking test can discriminate spinal stenosis from low back pain with radiating pain in lower limb.

Detailed Description

To date, an important challenge that clinicians hare facing in the assessment and diagnosis of intermittent claudication is that pathologies associated with vascular or neurogenic claudication can coexist in the same patient. Differentiation between both origins can be difficult due to variable signs and symptoms which can be atypical.

The first aim of this study was to elaborate and validate a treadmill walking test that would help discriminate between neurogenic claudication from vascular claudication. The second objective of this study is to determine if the treadmill walking test can discriminate spinal stenosis from low back pain with radiating pain in lower limb. 60 participants (20 with spinal stenosis, 20 with peripheral artery disease and 20 with non-specific low back pain) will be recruited. Participants will be invited to walk on a treadmill at a speed of 1,2 mph for a maximum of five minutes for both tasks (straight walking posture and inclined walking posture). Each walking task will be followed by a rest time of five minutes in sitting position. It is hypothesized that walking time difference for the occurrence of pain and for pain relief will be sensitive and specific to pathologies and help to discriminate lumbar spinal stenosis.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
55
Inclusion Criteria

Lumbar spinal stenosis (LSS) group :

  • Central stenosis
  • Pain in at least one leg
  • Neurological signs in the lower limbs (numbness or tingling)
  • Weaknesses in the lower limb
  • Pain relieved by sitting or bending the trunk

Peripheral artery disease (PAD) group :

  • Claudication while walking
  • Ankle-brachial index < 0.9
  • Pain relieved by rest

Low back pain (LBP) :

  • Pain radiating in the lower limb
  • Weaknesses
  • Pain relieved by sitting
Exclusion Criteria
  • Foraminal stenosis
  • Spinal stenosis with predominant back pain
  • Symptomatic disc herniation
  • Previous lumbar surgery
  • Previous vascular surgery
  • Type 1 diabetes
  • Knee or hip osteoarthritis
  • Hip or knee arthroplasty
  • Inability to provide free and informed consent

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
PAD groupTreadmill walking testParticipants with a diagnosis of peripheral artery disease
LBP groupTreadmill walking testParticipants with a diagnosis of non specific low back pain
LSS groupTreadmill walking testParticipants with a diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Walking timeTime first back or leg pain (vary between participants from 0 secondes to 300 secondes and is determine by the occurence of leg or back pain), Through the walking test completion
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Leg and back Pain (Visual analog scale)Before the walking test, through the walking test completion, at 2:30 minutes of rest, at 5 minutes of rest

leg and back pain using a 0-10 points scale

Walking impairment Questionnaire (WIQ)day 1, before the walking test (this is a transversal study)

WIQdistance subscale score range from 0 to 100%, WIQspeed subscale score range from 0 to 100%, WIQstairs subscale score range from 0 to 100%, WIQ total score combining distance,speed and stairs subscale range from 0 to 100% Higher values indicate better outcome

Tampa Scale of kinesiophobiaday 1, before the walking test (this is a transversal study)

Questionnaire, Total score range from 17 to 68, Higher score indicate a worst outcome

Quality of life of participantsday 1, before the walking test (this is a transversal study)

EuroQol 5 dimension (EQ-5D), each section (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression) has a score ranging from 1 to 3 and higher values indicate a worst outcome

Impact of pain, function and surgery satisfactionday 1, before the walking test (this is a transversal study)

French-Canadian adaptation of the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire Pain subscale score range from 7 to 35 with higher values indicate a worst outcome, Function subscale score range from 5 to 20 with higher values indicate a worst outcome, Satisfaction subscale score range from 6 to 24 with higher values indicate a worst outcome. The total score is composed of the three subscales and range from 18 to 79.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières

🇨🇦

Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath