Evaluation of an Intervention Model for Family Crisis and Support (a Research Project Within the Traumatic Brain Injury Model System Grant)
Overview
- Phase
- Not Applicable
- Intervention
- Not specified
- Conditions
- Traumatic Brain Injury
- Sponsor
- Virginia Commonwealth University
- Enrollment
- 160
- Locations
- 1
- Primary Endpoint
- Family Needs Questionnaire (FNQ)
- Status
- Completed
- Last Updated
- 12 years ago
Overview
Brief Summary
To learn more about how a family treatment program helps people after brain injury. Specifically, do families feel better and function better after going through the program, and do patients feel better and function better after going through the program.
Detailed Description
To evaluate the efficacy of a structured outpatient family intervention program (BIFI) on family members' emotional well being, life satisfaction, needs, and family functioning; and to evaluate the impact of the BIFI on the emotional well being, life satisfaction, functional independence, vocational status, and neurobehavioral functioning of persons with acquired brain injury (ABI).
Investigators
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria
- •Family members/caregiver friends and persons with acquired brain injury (ABI) who are at least three months postinjury. ABI is defined as damage to brain tissue caused by stroke, aneurysm, anoxia, or an external mechanical force as evidenced by: loss of consciousness, post traumatic amnesia (PTA), objective neurological findings, or skull fracture.
Exclusion Criteria
- •Families including individuals at imminent risk of psychiatric hospitalization, or in imminent danger of hurting themselves or others, as judged by the investigators.
- •Individuals under 18 years of age.
Outcomes
Primary Outcomes
Family Needs Questionnaire (FNQ)
Time Frame: pre-treatment, post-treatment, 3 mo. follow-up
The Family Needs Questionnaire (FNQ) is a widely used 40-item self-report questionnaire developed to measure family members' perceived needs after a family member sustains a brain injury. The items were designed to address diverse psychosocial and educational needs apparent in the acute and post-acute phases after injury. Family members rate the degree to which they perceive that each need has been met (not met, partly met, or met). A factor analytic investigation revealed six independent factors comprising six scales: Health Information, Emotional Support, Instrumental Support, Professional Support, Community Support Network, and Involvement with Care. The proportion of needs described as met (converted to a 10 point scale) was the primary family outcome measure.