A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Band Ligation and Cyanoacrylate Injection for Esophageal Varices
Phase 4
Completed
- Conditions
- Liver Disease
- Interventions
- Device: Variceal band ligationDrug: cyanoacrylate injection
- Registration Number
- NCT00799851
- Lead Sponsor
- Federal University of São Paulo
- Brief Summary
Compare VBL and cyanoacrylate injection (CI) in the treatment of EV in patients with advanced liver disease regarding eradication, bleeding, mortality, complication and recurrence rates.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 38
Inclusion Criteria
- advanced liver disease (Child-Pugh ≥ 8 points)
- medium and/or large esophageal varices
Exclusion Criteria
- prior endoscopic treatment.
- history of shunt operation
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Variceal band ligation Variceal band ligation VBL was performed with a multiband ligation device (Euroligator System®). The first band was placed at or close to the gastroesophageal junction, with subsequent bands being placed proximally in a slightly spiral pattern. All visible varices within the distal esophagus were treated, with a maximum of 10 bands being placed in each session. There was a 3-week interval between each treatment session. When VBL was technically impossible due to scarring, sclerotherapy with ethanolamine oleate was performed on thin vessels. cyanoacrylate injection cyanoacrylate injection CI group received intravariceal injections of 0.5 ml of N-butyl-2-cyanoacrylate (Histoacryl®) diluted in 0.5 ml of Lipiodol (Lipiodol®). Before injection of the Histoacryl-Lipiodol mixture, the catheter was filled up with 1 ml of Lipiodol. After puncturing the EV, the mixture was injected inside it and followed by injection of 1 ml of distilled water. Finally the catheter was retracted. To minimize the risk of embolism, a maximum of two medium or large vessels, in opposite walls, were treated in each session and not more than 0.5 ml of Histoacryl® was injected into each vessel. A second injection was performed in any EV that maintained blood flow (medium or large size, blue, depressive at palpation with the catheter), in a bi-weekly interval basis. A chest x-ray was performed to evaluate the location of the Histoacryl-Lipiodol solution. Small vessels were treated with ethanolamine oleate sclerotherapy.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Compare VBL and cyanoacrylate injection (CI) in the treatment of EV in patients with advanced liver disease regarding eradication, bleeding, mortality, complication and recurrence rates.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
What are the molecular mechanisms underlying variceal band ligation efficacy in advanced liver disease?
How does cyanoacrylate injection compare to band ligation in preventing esophageal variceal rebleeding rates?
Which biomarkers correlate with successful eradication of esophageal varices in cirrhosis patients?
What adverse events are associated with endoscopic cyanoacrylate injection in portal hypertension management?
Are there combination therapies involving band ligation or cyanoacrylate for variceal hemorrhage in decompensated cirrhosis?
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Federal University Of São Paulo - Gastroenterology
🇧🇷São Paulo, Brazil
Federal University Of São Paulo - Gastroenterology🇧🇷São Paulo, Brazil