MedPath

Transcatheter Closure Versus Surgery of Perimembranous Ventricular Septal Defects

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Ventricular Septal Defects
Interventions
Device: Shanghai pmVSD occluder
Procedure: surgery
Registration Number
NCT00890799
Lead Sponsor
Xijing Hospital
Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate effectiveness and safety of transcatheter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects.

Detailed Description

Perimembranous Ventricular septal defect (VSD) is the most common congenital cardiac malformation and constitutes over 20% of all congenital cardiac disease. Though conventional surgery for VSD is a widely accepted procedure with minimal operative mortality, it carries a small but definite risk of morbidity and mortality associated with cardiopulmonary bypass and surgical closure. The newly appeared transcatheter device closure technique provides an alternative to surgical closure. However, the mid-to-long term effects of this technique using occluders is not clear. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of transcatheter closure of perimembranous ventricular septal defects using septal occluders.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
200
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients with ventricular septal defects eligible for transcatheter closure.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients less than 2 years old. Patients not suitable for transcatheter closure. Patients comorbid with other diseases.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
occludersShanghai pmVSD occluderShanghai pmVSD occluder (LEPU Medical Tech-nology Co, Ltd, Beijing, China) was used in this study.
occluderssurgeryShanghai pmVSD occluder (LEPU Medical Tech-nology Co, Ltd, Beijing, China) was used in this study.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Major adverse eventstill study end

Major adverse events included but were not limited to death during or after the procedure because of complications of the procedure,cAVB requiring pacemaker implantation, thromboembolism, and new-onset valvular regurgitation requiring surgical repair.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Minor adverse eventsTill study end

Minor adverse events included but were not limited to groin hematoma, blood loss requiring transfusion, device embolization with transcatheter removal, any cardiac arrhythmia that required medication, new or increased valvular regurgitation less than two grades, hemolysis requiring medication, fever \>38.5°C, rash, and loss of peripheral pulse. These minor adverse events required medical intervention but were not life threatening; they had no long-term sequelae and did not require long-term therapy.

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath