CIRCumcision and Urinary Tract Infections in Boys With Posterior Urethral Valves
- Conditions
- Posterior Urethral Valves
- Interventions
- Procedure: CircumcisionOther: Antibiotic prophylaxis alone
- Registration Number
- NCT01537601
- Lead Sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de la Réunion
- Brief Summary
Children with posterior urethral valves (PUV) are at risk of presenting febrile urinary tract infections (UTI). Circumcision has been shown to decrease the number of febrile UTIs in healthy children. The effect of circumcision on the number of UTIs in boys with PUV has not yet been studied. Through a prospective randomised trial of children with posterior urethral valves the investigators wish to determine the effect of circumcision on the risk of presenting febrile UTIs. One group will be on antibiotic prophylaxis alone and the other will be on antibiotic prophylaxis plus circumcision performed at the time of valve resection. Both groups will be followed for two years, with clinical examination at 1, 3, 6, 12, 18 and 24 months. A DMSA scan will be performed at 1-2 and 24 months and biological renal function will also be monitored. The relative risk of presenting a febrile UTI in each group will be determined. Clinical, radiological and antenatal data concerning each child will be analysed. At 24 months follow-up, an "impact on family scale" survey (IOFS) will be proposed parents.
- Detailed Description
After diagnosis of posterior urethral valves, children will be randomised either to antibioprophylaxis alone or antibioprophylaxis plus circumcision. Circumcision will be performed at the time of valve resection. Children will undergo a cystogram between 1 and 4 months to control valve resection. They will be followed for two years and the number of febrile UTIs in each group will be compared. The diagnosis of febrile UTI will be confirmed by urethral catheterisation or suprapubic aspiration. A DMSA scan will be performed at the beginning and end of the study to determine whether children who have presented febrile UTIs show deterioration of their DMSA as compared to those who did not present febrile UTIs.
At 24 months follow-up, "impact on family scale" survey (IOFS) whose main objective is to evaluate the impact of family support for a child with posterior urethral valves will be proposed parents.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- Male
- Target Recruitment
- 92
- male
- aged 0 to 28 days
- diagnosed with posterior urethral valves within the 28 first day of life
- holders of parental authority affiliated to French national health insurance
- informed consent signed by holders of parental authority
- boys with hypospadias or epispadias or any other anomaly rendering circumcision impossible
- concomitant participation to another clinical trial
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Circumcision and antibiotic prophylaxis Circumcision Children will have a circumcision at the time of valve resection and will be on antibioprophylaxis Antibiotic prophylaxis alone Antibiotic prophylaxis alone Children will be on antibioprophylaxis and will not have a circumcision.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Relative risk of presenting a febrile UTI 24 months
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method number and type of adverse effects related to circumcision and antibiotic prophylaxis 24 months Number of children with febrile UTIs in each group at two years 24 months Comparison of the number of children who will show deterioration of their DMSA scan between children who have had UTIs and those who have not. 24 months Evolution of the grade of reflux At diagnosis and at 3 months Evolution of compliance to antibioprophylaxis. 24 months Identification of the responsible bacteria 24 months
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Department of pediatric surgery, Bordeaux hospital
🇫🇷Bordeaux, France