Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT05206162
NCT05206162CompletedNot Applicable

TMS-EEG as a Tool to Study the Neuromodulatory Effects of Theta Burst Stimulation

University Hospital, Ghent1 site in 1 country15 target enrollmentStarted: August 2, 2017Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Completed
Enrollment
15
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
TBS-induced modulation of single-pulse TMS-evoked EEG responses (TEPs) - Local Mean Field Power (LMFP) across a region of interest (ROI)

Study Overview

Brief Summary

To assess the effect of continuous (cTBS) and intermittent theta burst stimulation (iTBS) stimulation on motor cortex excitability using TMS-EEG. Based on prior literature, the investigators hypothesized that N100 amplitude would be differently modulated by these two modalities.

Detailed Description

Each participant underwent three experimental sessions, at least one week apart in a cross-over design, assessing the effects of a single TBS train over the motor cortex on TMS-evoked potentials measured at the same location and resting-state EEG, immediately before and after the intervention. At each session a different type of TBS was applied (cTBS, iTBS or sham) in a randomized sequence. Subjects were uninformed about the expected effects of each intervention. Sham stimulation was achieved by adding a plastic spacer (25mm thickness) between coil and scalp, preventing effective cortical stimulation.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Crossover
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
Male
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • Age 18-65 years
  • Right handed subjects
  • Healthy participants, as determined by history, clinical investigation and investigator's judgment
  • No history of central nervous system condition
  • No chronic intake of neurotropic drugs
  • TMS Safety Screening questionnaire and informed consent signed

Exclusion Criteria

  • Pregnancy, short-term birth wish or childbearing age without adequate birth control
  • Intracranial metal hardware (excluding dental filling): surgical clips, shrapnell, electrodes under the stimulation area
  • Presence of pacemaker, implantable cardioverter-defibrillator (ICD), permanent medication pumps, cochlear implants or deep brain stimulation (DBS)

Arms & Interventions

continuous theta burst stimulation

Active Comparator

cTBS over the left motor hotspot, delivered at 80% of resting motor threshold (RMT), according to the Huang et al. protocol, consisting of bursts of stimuli that are presented every 200ms (5Hz), with bursts consisting of 3 stimuli at 50 Hz. A total of 600 pulses are delivered in a continuous train of 40s.

Intervention: theta burst stimulation (Device)

intermittent theta burst stimulation

Active Comparator

iTBS over the left motor hotspot, delivered at 80% of resting motor threshold (RMT), according to the Huang et al. protocol, consisting of bursts of stimuli that are presented every 200ms (5Hz), with bursts consisting of 3 stimuli at 50 Hz. A total of 600 pulses are delivered in an intermittent train of 190s for iTBS, with repeated cycles of 2s stimulation and 8s pause.

Intervention: theta burst stimulation (Device)

sham stimulation

Sham Comparator

Sham stimulation over the left motor hotspot, delivered at 80% of resting motor threshold (RMT), according to the Huang et al. protocol, consisting of bursts of stimuli that are presented every 200ms (5Hz), with bursts consisting of 3 stimuli at 50 Hz. A total of 600 pulses are delivered in a continuous train of 40s using a plastic spacer (25mm thickness) between coil and scalp, preventing effective cortical stimulation.

Intervention: theta burst stimulation (Device)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

TBS-induced modulation of single-pulse TMS-evoked EEG responses (TEPs) - Local Mean Field Power (LMFP) across a region of interest (ROI)

Time Frame: measurement takes place immediate before and after TBS stimulation train

TBS-induced modulation of single-pulse TMS-evoked EEG responses (TEPs) - peak latency/amplitude of TEP components at Cz

Time Frame: measurement takes place immediate before and after TBS stimulation train

TBS-induced modulation of single-pulse TMS-evoked EEG responses (TEPs) - divergence index (DI) across all EEG channels

Time Frame: measurement takes place immediate before and after TBS stimulation train

Secondary Outcomes

  • TBS-induced modulation of paired-pulse TMS-evoked EEG responses (TEPs)(measurement takes place immediate before and after TBS stimulation train)
  • TBS-induced modulation of resting-state EEG(measurement takes place immediate before and after a single TBS stimulation train)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Prof. Dr. Kristl Vonck

Prof. Dr. Boon

University Hospital, Ghent

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials