Femoral Tunnel Position on Conventional MRI After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction-Transtibial Technique Versus Transportal Technique
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 64
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Lysholm score
研究概览
简要总结
The position of the femoral tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction has been assessed on three dimensional CT (3D-CT) scan or in cadaveric study. However, these methods have some issues; 3D-CT scan has a concern on radiation exposure and cadaveric study is not easily available nor an in vivo test. The purpose of this study is to compare the position of the femoral tunnel aperture on conventional MRI and the outcomes after single bundle ACL reconstruction using free tendon Achilles allograft between transportal technique and transtibial technique in active young men.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Double (Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 17 Years 至 45 Years（Child, Adult）
- 性别
- Male
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament rupture
排除标准
- •over 45 years old
- •the subjects who had ACL reconstruction with graft other than Achilles allograft
- •the subjects who had concomitant other ligament injuries on the same knee needing surgical treatment
- •revision ACL reconstruction
- •double bundle ACL reconstruction
- •concomitant full thickness cartilage injury needing cartilage repairing surgery
结局指标
主要结局
Lysholm score
时间窗: at least two years after surgery
Lysholm score was superior in transportal technique to transtibial technique.
Position of femoral tunnel aperture
时间窗: within one week after surgery
The position of the femoral tunnel aperture with transportal technique was more posterior than that of transtibial technique.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Jung Ho Noh
Principal investigator
National Police Hospital