MedPath

Virtual Reality Distraction During Pediatric Intravenous Line Placement

Not Applicable
Conditions
Pediatric IV Placement
Virtual Reality Distraction
Interventions
Device: Virtual Reality
Registration Number
NCT03304769
Lead Sponsor
University of Texas at Austin
Brief Summary

This study aims to prospectively investigate the use of virtual reality headsets on the placement of IVs in a pediatric emergency department, by comparing the first stick success rate, total number of attempts, and the time to successful IV placement between patients who use virtual reality headset technology during the placement and those who receive the standard of care IV placement when child life ( individuals with special training in aiding and augmenting pediatric coping skills) is not available. The investigators will also compare the patient and parent perception of pain and anxiety associated with the IV placement in both study groups. Finally, by detailing which medications have been given prior to use of the VR for IV placement the investigators may evaluate for possible synergistic effects of VR with prior medication administration.

Detailed Description

Children often describe procedures involving needles as the most stressful portion of the hospital experience. 1,2 Many studies involving the perception of pain have highlighted the importance of attention for the perception of pain, and, conversely, the benefit of distraction for decreasing pain perception. 3,4 Virtual reality technologies (VR) have been shown to mitigate the experience of pain and anxiety in patients undergoing procedures in a number of different ways. 5,6 While small studies have demonstrated the use of VR to be effective in diminishing pain during intravenous (IV) placement for outpatient imaging in pediatric patients aged 8-12, there have not been large-scale studies assessing the use of VR during IV placement in the Pediatric Emergency Department. 7 Studies examining the use of VR during venipuncture and IV placement also frequently focus on self-reported or parent-reported pain, rather than objectively quantifying number of IV sticks and time to successful IV placement.8 Additionally, the pediatric age ranges which benefit from VR have not been well-established, with some studies citing benefits only in patients over 10 years of age, and others showing improvements in all age groups.7,9,10

This study aims to prospectively investigate the use of virtual reality headsets on the placement of IVs in a pediatric emergency department, by comparing the first stick success rate, total number of attempts, and the time to successful IV placement between patients who use virtual reality headset technology during the placement and those who receive the standard of care IV placement when child life ( individuals with special training in aiding and augmenting pediatric coping skills) is not available. The investigators will also compare the patient and parent perception of pain and anxiety associated with the IV placement in both study groups. Finally, by detailing which medications have been given prior to use of the VR for IV placement the investigators may evaluate for possible synergistic effects of VR with prior medication administration.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
UNKNOWN
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
116
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patient aged 4-17 years
  • Requiring IV placement
  • Child Life unavailable
Exclusion Criteria
  • Previous enrollment in the study
  • Physically/ developmentally unable to tolerate headset
  • Skin/eye pathology
  • Critically ill patient
  • Language other than English or Spanish
  • Student Nurse placing IV

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
IV placement with Virtual RealityVirtual RealityPatient will have IV placed with Virtual Reality headset distraction
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Successful IV placement with first attempt6 months

success in first attempt in VR group vs non VR group

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
time to establishing successful IV6 months

time to establishing successful IV in VR group vs non VR group

number of attempts before successfully establishing IV6 months

number of attempts before successful IV placement in VR group vs non VR group

Pre vs Post FACES revised pain scale parents6 months

Pre vs Post FACES pain scale in VR group vs non VR group

Pre vs Post FACES revised pain Scale patients6 months

Pre vs Post FACES pain scale in VR group vs non VR group

Pre vs Post Likert-Type Anxiety Scale - parents6 months

Pre vs Post Likert-Type Anxiety Scale of parents in VR group vs non VR group

Pre vs Post Likert-Type Anxiety Scale- patients6 months

Pre vs Post Likert-Type Anxiety Scale of patients in VR group vs non VR group

age range of patients that tolerate VR6 months

Which of evaluated age range of 4-17 years tolerate VR placement

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Dell Children's Medical Center of Central Texas

🇺🇸

Austin, Texas, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath