Subcutaneous Nerve Stimulation for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (FBSS) Patients
- Conditions
- Failed Back Surgery SyndromePost-laminectomy Syndrome
- Interventions
- Device: PrimeAdvanced® neurostimulator system
- Registration Number
- NCT01818297
- Lead Sponsor
- MedtronicNeuro
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of Subcutaneous Nerve Stimulation (SQS) (also known as Peripheral Nerve Stimulation \[PNS\]) in the reduction of chronic, intractable post-surgical back pain in adults.
- Detailed Description
This study is a multi-center, prospective, randomized (1:1) parallel-group design.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- TERMINATED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 137
- Have persistent back pain for at least 6 months
- Had back surgery at least 6 months ago
- Have tried pain medications and physical therapy
- Read and understand written English or Spanish
- Male or non-pregnant female. If female of child-bearing potential, and if sexually active, must be using a medically-acceptable method of birth control during study participation
- Willing and able to undergo surgical implant procedure, attend visits as scheduled, and comply with the study requirements
- Have an expected lifespan greater than 12 months
Key
- Have leg pain in addition to back pain.
- Currently enrolled in or plan to enroll in another drug and/or device study
- Have peripheral vascular disease, peripheral neuropathy, small-fiber neuropathy, or fibromyalgia
- Have an active systemic infection or are immunocompromised
- Will be exposed to diathermy or anticipate needing a full-body MRI scan
- Currently have an implantable cardiac pacemaker, defibrillator, or neurostimulator
- Treated with spinal cord stimulation, peripheral nerve stimulation, an intrathecal drug delivery system or requires additional back surgery
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Treatment PrimeAdvanced® neurostimulator system Treatment settings of Medtronic PrimeAdvanced® neurostimulator system implant Control PrimeAdvanced® neurostimulator system Control settings of Medtronic PrimeAdvanced® neurostimulator system implant
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Number of Back Pain Responders (Subjects Who Achieve at Least a 50% Reduction in Average Back Pain With no Increase in Prescription Pain Medications) From Baseline to Month 3 Post-device Activation. Baseline to 3 months Number of responders in Treatment and Control groups. Subjects reported typical back pain (0=no pain, 10=worst pain) during the Baseline (BL) and Blinded Phase (M3) periods. Percentage reduction in average back pain was calculated as (BL-M3)/BL. Subjects with at least a 50% reduction in average back pain between Baseline and Month 3, with no increase in prescribed pain medications, were considered responders.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Subject Satisfaction 3 months Compare difference in number of subjects satisfied with therapy between the Treatment and Control groups at Month 3. Subjects who reported they were very or somewhat satisfied with the therapy were counted as satisfied. Subjects with no satisfaction response were excluded from the analysis.
Worst Back Pain Baseline to 3 months Compare the average improvement in worst back pain from Baseline to Month 3 between the Treatment and Control groups. Subjects reported worst back pain (0 (no pain) - 10 (worst pain)) during the Baseline and Blinded Phase (Month 3) periods. Change was calculated as Baseline - Month 3, with a positive change indicating improvement in worst back pain.
Quality of Life: Physical Baseline to 3 months Compare the average change in quality of life (as measured by Short Form Health Survey (SF36 v2): Physical component score (PCS)) from Baseline to Month 3 between subjects in the Treatment and Control groups. The PCS ranges from 0 (worst possible physicial quality of life) to 100 (best possible physical quality of life). Change was calculated as Month 3 - Baseline, with a positive difference indicating improvement in physical quality of life. Subjects with missing Baseline and/or Month 3 SF-36: PCS assessments were counted as no change (Month 3 - Baseline = 0).
Functional Disability Baseline to 3 months Compare the difference in average improvement in disability (as measured by Oswestry Disability Index (ODI)) from Baseline to Month 3 between the Treatment and Control groups. ODI ranges from 0% (no disability) -100% (greatest disability). Change is calculated as Baseline - Month 3 with a positive change indicating improvement in disability. Subjects with missing Baseline and/or Month 3 ODI assessments were counted as no change (Baseline - Month 3 = 0).
Quality of Life: Mental Baseline to 3 months Compare the average change in quality of life (as measured by Short Form Health Survey (SF36 v2): Mental component score (MCS)) from Baseline to Month 3 between subjects in the Treatment and Control groups. The MCS ranges from 0 (worst possible mental quality of life) to 100 (best possible mental quality of life). Change was calculated as Month 3 - Baseline, with a positive difference indicating improvement in mental quality of life. Subjects with missing Baseline and/or Month 3 SF-36: MCS assessments were counted as no change (Month 3 - Baseline = 0).
Trial Locations
- Locations (27)
University of Illinois at Chicago
🇺🇸Chicago, Illinois, United States
Columbia Interventional Pain Center, LLP
🇺🇸Columbia, Missouri, United States
Mercy Medical Research Institute
🇺🇸Springfield, Missouri, United States
Valley Pain Consultants
🇺🇸Phoenix, Arizona, United States
HOPE Research Institute
🇺🇸Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Coastal Pain Research
🇺🇸Carlsbad, California, United States
Pain Medicine Associates
🇺🇸Fountain Valley, California, United States
Florida Pain Institute
🇺🇸Merritt Island, Florida, United States
Advanced Medicine and Pain Management Research
🇺🇸Miami, Florida, United States
Compass Research, LLC
🇺🇸Orlando, Florida, United States
Emory University School of Medicine
🇺🇸Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Willis Knighton River Cities Clinical Research Center
🇺🇸Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
Comprehensive Pain and Rehabilitation
🇺🇸Pascagoula, Mississippi, United States
University Hospitals Case Medical Center
🇺🇸Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Mayfield Clinic
🇺🇸Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Ohio State University
🇺🇸Columbus, Ohio, United States
Summa Western Reserve Hospital
🇺🇸Cuyahoga Falls, Ohio, United States
DNA Advanced Pain Treatment Center
🇺🇸Greensburg, Pennsylvania, United States
Southern Spine Institute
🇺🇸Mount Pleasant, South Carolina, United States
Austin Pain Associates
🇺🇸Cedar Park, Texas, United States
Space City Pain Specialists
🇺🇸Webster, Texas, United States
Lifetree Clinical Research
🇺🇸Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Wisconsin Health Center Surgery Center
🇺🇸Greenfield, Wisconsin, United States
NYU Langone Medical Center
🇺🇸New York, New York, United States
Rush University Medical Center
🇺🇸Chicago, Illinois, United States
Thomas Jefferson University
🇺🇸Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
University of Kansas Medical Center
🇺🇸Kansas City, Kansas, United States