MedPath

Use of High Flow Nasal Cannula Oxygen and Covid-19 Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure

Completed
Conditions
Respiratory Syndrome, Acute, Severe
Hypoxic Respiratory Failure
Viral Pneumonia
Registration Number
NCT04385823
Lead Sponsor
H么pital Louis Mourier
Brief Summary

Nasal High Flow oxygen therapy (NHF) is commonly used as first line ventilatory support in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). It's use has been initially limited in Covid-19 patients presenting with AHRF. The aim of the study is to describe the use of NHF in Covid-19-related AHRF and report the changes in the respiratory-oxygenation index (termed ROX index) over time in these patients.

Detailed Description

Nasal High Flow oxygen therapy (NHF) is one of the newer methods of oxygenation commonly used in critical care during acute hypoxemic respiratory failure (AHRF). For various reasons (fear of a putative risk of viral dispersion; initial recommendations for rapid intubation due to the rapid deterioration of patients), NHF seems to have been seldomly used during the current Covid-19 epidemic in France. However, the World Health Organization, and other scientific societies list NHF among the possible options for ventilatory support.

One of the risks however, identified with NHF is to delay an intubation that would have become necessary. This delay seems to be associated with a poorer prognosis for patients.

The respiratory-oxygenation index (termed ROX index) (defined as the ratio of pulse oximetry (SpO2) over inspired fraction in oxygen (FiO2) over respiratory rate (RR); SpO2/FiO2/RR) is used - along with other criteria - to assist the clinician in deciding whether or not to intubate patients on NHF for AHRF. In investigators'ICU, NHF is used in patients admitted for AHRFrelated to Covid-19 and the ROX index is measured and monitoring in investigators' patients. Investigators' initial experience - consistent with feedback from other ICUs - suggests that the respiratory rate of patients with Covid-19-related AHRF is sometimes lower than would be expected given the depth of the hypoxemia. In this case, the ROX index thresholds previously identified for predicting the success or failure of NHF could be different in the case of Covid-19-associated AHRF. The purpose of this work is to describe the use of NHF in Covid-19 patients with AHRF and the evolution of the ROX score over time in patients initially treated with NHF.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
62
Inclusion Criteria
  • Covid-19 pneumonia
  • acute hypoxemic respiratory failure
  • need for nasal high flow therapy as first line therapy
  • admission to intensive care
Exclusion Criteria
  • intubation prior to NHF therapy

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Changes in ROX indexfrom date of NHF initiation until date of weaning from NHF or date of intubation whichever came first, assessed up to 2 months

values of ROX index during ICU stay

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
NHF failurefrom date of NHF initiation until date of weaning from NHF or date of intubation whichever came first, assessed up to 2 months

percentage of patients requiring intubation

NHF flowfrom date of NHF initiation until date of weaning from NHF or date of intubation whichever came first, assessed up to 2 months

level of flow used with NHF

NHF inspired fraction in oxygenfrom date of NHF initiation until date of weaning from NHF or date of intubation whichever came first, assessed up to 2 months

level of inspired fraction in oxygen used with NHF

oxygenationfrom date of NHF initiation until date of weaning from NHF or date of intubation whichever came first, assessed up to 2 months

level of pulse oxymetry during NHF therapy

respiratory statusfrom date of NHF initiation until date of weaning from NHF or date of intubation whichever came first, assessed up to 2 months

respiratory rate during NHF therapy

prediction of intubationfrom date of NHF initiation until date of weaning from NHF or date of intubation whichever came first, assessed up to 2 months

defining the values of ROX index associated with intubation

prediction of NHF successfrom date of NHF initiation until date of weaning from NHF or date of intubation whichever came first, assessed up to 2 months

defining the values of ROX index associated with NHF success (no intubation required)

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

H么pital Louis Mourier, Assistance Publique - H么pitaux de Paris

馃嚝馃嚪

Colombes, France

漏 Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath