跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2024/06/069325
CTRI/2024/06/069325已完成2 期

Effect of Activities of Daily Living simulated exergaming on hand function and reaction time in young and middle old elderly: An Experimental study

K J Somaiya College of Physiotherapy,1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 64 人开始时间: 2024年7月1日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
2 期
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
64
试验地点
1
主要终点
1. Minnesota Manual Dexterity test for gross motor skills

研究概览

简要总结

This experimental study aimed to evaluate the effect of Activities of Daily Living (ADL)-simulated exergaming on hand function and reaction time in young-old and middle-old elderly individuals.

Primary Objectives:

  1. To assess hand function (gross motor, fine motor, and functional limitation) in the Exergaming group pre-intervention, after one week, and after two weeks using the Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test (MMDT), Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT), and Duruoz Hand Index (DHI).

  2. To assess hand function in the control exercise group at the same three time points using the same outcome measures.

  3. To assess reaction time in the Exergaming group pre-intervention, after one week, and after two weeks using the Deary–Liewald Reaction Time Test (DLRT).

  4. To assess reaction time in the control group at the same three time points using the DLRT.

  5. To compare hand function between the Exergaming and control groups using MMDT, PPT, and DHI.

  6. To compare reaction time between the Exergaming and control groups using the DLRT.

Methods: This experimental study included 66 participants, with 33 in the Exergaming group and 33 in the control group. The intervention lasted for two weeks, with 10 supervised sessions administered. Data were analysed using GraphPad Prism 10 Free version. The Shapiro–Wilk test assessed normality. Within-group comparisons at three time points (pre-intervention, post-1-week, post-2-weeks) were analysed with Repeated Measures ANOVA for MMDT, PPT, and DLRT. For DHI (non-parametric), the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test was used. Between-group comparisons were analysed with One-Way ANOVA and Tukey’s post-hoc test for parametric data, and the Mann–Whitney U test for DHI. A significance level of p < 0.05 was maintained.

Results: Both groups demonstrated improvement in hand function over the intervention period; however, participants in the Exergaming group showed significantly greater gains compared to the control group. Improvements were observed consistently across the Minnesota Manual Dexterity Test (MMDT), Purdue Pegboard Test (PPT), and Duruoz Hand Index (DHI), indicating enhanced gross and fine motor dexterity as well as better self-reported functional hand use.

In terms of reaction time, the Exergaming group exhibited significant reductions in Deary-Liewald Reaction Time (DLRT) scores for both simple and choice reaction time, reflecting faster processing speed and improved motor responsiveness. The control group also demonstrated some improvement, though to a lesser extent.

When comparing groups, the Exergaming intervention outperformed the control intervention across all primary outcome measures. Statistically significant between-group differences were observed in MMDT, PPT, DHI, and DLRT, confirming that exergaming provided superior benefits for both hand function and reaction time relative to traditional exercises.

Conclusion: All study objectives were successfully fulfilled.

ADL-simulated exergaming was found to be a feasible and effective intervention to enhance hand function and reduce reaction time in elderly individuals, and it may be considered as a useful adjunct in geriatric rehabilitation programs.

The findings emphasize that rehabilitation strategies which integrate biological (motor function), psychological (cognitive-motivational), and social (participation, independence) domains may yield more holistic and sustainable outcomes in the elderly. ADL-simulated exergaming therefore represents not only an effective motor training tool but also a comprehensive biopsychosocial intervention that can be incorporated into geriatric rehabilitation programs to promote independence, safety, and quality of life.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
60.00 Year(s) 至 80.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • 60 to 80 years community dwelling elderly able to understand and follow instructions in English Individuals of all genders Individuals scoring more than 3 in Mini-Cog scale.

排除标准

  • Individuals with any uncorrected visual or auditory impairment.
  • Individuals with a history of surgical, traumatic, inflammatory musculoskeletal condition, unstable angina or any neurological conditions or any acute upper limb injury in the past 6 months.
  • Any hospitalisation in the past 6 months.

结局指标

主要结局

1. Minnesota Manual Dexterity test for gross motor skills

时间窗: (a) Pre-treatment assessment | (b) After one week of intervention | (c) After two weeks of intervention

2.Purdue Pegboard test for fine motor skills

时间窗: (a) Pre-treatment assessment | (b) After one week of intervention | (c) After two weeks of intervention

3. Duruoz Hand Index- self-reported questionnaire for assessing the hand activity limitation and its effect on ADLs

时间窗: (a) Pre-treatment assessment | (b) After one week of intervention | (c) After two weeks of intervention

4. Deary Liewald reaction time test

时间窗: (a) Pre-treatment assessment | (b) After one week of intervention | (c) After two weeks of intervention

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
K J Somaiya College of Physiotherapy,
申办方类型
Research institution and hospital
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Dr Vidhi Hitesh Doshi

K J Somaiya College of Physiotherapy,Sion

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验