Comparison of Outcomes of Rotator Cuff Repair With a Modified Versus Classic Double-Row Suture -Bridge Techniques
Not Applicable
Completed
- Conditions
- Rotator Cuff Tears
- Interventions
- Procedure: Rotator Cuff Repair With a Modified Versus Classic Double-Row Suture -Bridge Techniques
- Registration Number
- NCT06394856
- Lead Sponsor
- Sohag University
- Brief Summary
rotator cuff tears are one of the most common shoulder issues , affecting 20.7% of the general population .
- Detailed Description
accompanied by shoulder pain and dysfunction
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 89
Inclusion Criteria
- full-thickness supraspinatus
- degenerative tears
- age range 40 :65
Exclusion Criteria
- subscapularis tear
- small and massive tears
- traumatic tears
- partial -thickness tear
- revisioin surgery
- glenohumeral arthretic changes and shoulder instability
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description knotless group Rotator Cuff Repair With a Modified Versus Classic Double-Row Suture -Bridge Techniques rotator cuff repair with a modified knotless anchors knot-tying group Rotator Cuff Repair With a Modified Versus Classic Double-Row Suture -Bridge Techniques rotator cuff repair with classic knot-tying double-row suture bridge technique by classic anchors
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method retear rate 3 years retear rate
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method time 3 years duration of operation
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
university Hospital
🇪🇬Sohag, Egypt