MedPath

Comparison of Outcomes of Rotator Cuff Repair With a Modified Versus Classic Double-Row Suture -Bridge Techniques

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Rotator Cuff Tears
Interventions
Procedure: Rotator Cuff Repair With a Modified Versus Classic Double-Row Suture -Bridge Techniques
Registration Number
NCT06394856
Lead Sponsor
Sohag University
Brief Summary

rotator cuff tears are one of the most common shoulder issues , affecting 20.7% of the general population .

Detailed Description

accompanied by shoulder pain and dysfunction

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
89
Inclusion Criteria
  • full-thickness supraspinatus
  • degenerative tears
  • age range 40 :65
Exclusion Criteria
  • subscapularis tear
  • small and massive tears
  • traumatic tears
  • partial -thickness tear
  • revisioin surgery
  • glenohumeral arthretic changes and shoulder instability

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
knotless groupRotator Cuff Repair With a Modified Versus Classic Double-Row Suture -Bridge Techniquesrotator cuff repair with a modified knotless anchors
knot-tying groupRotator Cuff Repair With a Modified Versus Classic Double-Row Suture -Bridge Techniquesrotator cuff repair with classic knot-tying double-row suture bridge technique by classic anchors
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
retear rate3 years

retear rate

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
time3 years

duration of operation

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

university Hospital

🇪🇬

Sohag, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath