A comparison of calibration methods when templating fot total hip replacements
- Conditions
- calibration templatinghip replacementdigital radiologymagnification
- Registration Number
- NL-OMON29276
- Lead Sponsor
- Atrium medisch centrum Parkstad
- Brief Summary
/A
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Pending
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 30
Inclusion Criteria
Patients who are referred for a routine radiograph of the hip prothesis. Patient must have a hip prothesis with a known size of the femoral head. The femoral head has to be measurable on the digital radiograph.
Exclusion Criteria
Hip prothesis with a femoral head that is not measurable or not known.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Observational non invasive
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Comparison of four systems for calibration when templating for total hip replacement with digital radiography. In this trial we are investigating the accuracy of the double marker technique next to our gold standard, the fixed magnification. Also the results of the measured magnification (per patient) and single marker technique are included and compared.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Interobserver-variation for each method