Apexification Treatment With MTA(Mineral Trioxide Aggregate) and Ca(OH)2

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: Immature Teeth
• Interventions: Other: Calcium hydroxide; Other: Mineral trioxide aggregate

• Registration Number: NCT03855501
• Lead Sponsor: Ege University

Brief Summary

Ninety immature teeth with necrotic pulps and periapical lesions on patients (aged 16-40y) were treated with AT using MTA (45 teeth) or CH (45 teeth) between 2015 and 2018. The patients were contacted for follow-up examination at 12 to 48 months after treatment. The treatment outcome based on clinical and radiographic criteria was assessed by calibrated examiners and dichotomized as "healed+healing" or "not healed". The age, gender, stage of root development, preoperative signs and symptoms of apical periodontitis and size of periapical lesion were recorded.

Detailed Description

The aim of the study was to evaluate and compare the influence of various predictors on outcomes of apexification treatment (AT) using either mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) or calcium hydroxide (CH) to treat permanent immature anterior teeth with necrotic pulps and periapical lesions in adults. Ninety immature teeth with necrotic pulps and periapical lesions on patients (aged 16-40y) were treated with AT using MTA (45 teeth) or CH (45 teeth) between 2015 and 2018. The patients were contacted for follow-up examination at 12 to 48 months after treatment. The treatment outcome based on clinical and radiographic criteria was assessed by calibrated examiners and dichotomized as "healed+healing" or "not healed". The age, gender, stage of root development, preoperative signs and symptoms of apical periodontitis and size of periapical lesion were recorded. The effect of potential clinical variables on the treatment outcome of AT was evaluated clinically and radiographically during a 12-48-month follow-up. In order to assess the cumulative successes of CH and MTA after AT, Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and log-rank test was used(p\>0.05).

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2015-01
• Primary Completion: 2019-01
• Status Verified: 2019-02
• Study Completion: 2019-02
• Study First Submitted: 2019-02-25
• Study First Submitted QC: 2019-02-25
• Study First Posted: 2019-02-26
• Last Update Submitted: 2019-02-26
• Last Update Posted: 2019-02-28

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 90

Inclusion Criteria

• patients without a systemic disease and compromised immune status
• patients had immature teeth with periapical lesions with or without previous endodontic treatment.

Exclusion Criteria

• patients with advanced periodontitis (more than 5 mm periodontal attachment and bone loss),
• teeth with contraindications for endodontic treatment (root fracture, unrestorable tooth, replacement resorption or previous surgical endodontic treatment).

Study & Design

• Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL
• Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Calcium hydroxide	Calcium hydroxide	After using the same biomechanical root canal preparation protocol, the root canal was filled to working length with CH paste. Both clinical and radiographical examinations were performed to evaluate the barrier formation and periapical healing. When a continuous hard tissue barrier was observed apically on radiographs that was verified by clinical probing and complete or significant periapical healing was noticed, the root canal was obturated and coronary restorations were completed as done in MTA group
Mineral trioxide aggregate	Mineral trioxide aggregate	The root canals were gently instrumented with K-files and copious irrigation was done with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite(NaOCI) by means of a 30 gauge endodontic irrigating needle . After drying with large sterile paper points, calcium hydroxide(CH) paste was mixed with saline and applied to the root canal with a lentulo spiral filler at low speed. A cotton pellet was used to gently compress CH into the root canal and its placement was examined radiographically before placing ZOE as temporary restoration into the access cavity. After one week, CH was removed from the canal by using both the files and the irrigation with 2.5% NaOCI and 17% ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). A final irrigation was made with 2% chlorhexidine (CHX) before obturation. Following drying the root canal with sterile paper points, MTA was placed with a MTA Endo Gun into the apical portion of canals with a minimum 4-mm thickness and adapted to the canal walls with an endodontic hand plugger.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
The rate of the healing of the periapical lesion	12 to 48 months	Follow-up visits were performed 12 to 48 months. Changes in apical bone density was evaluated with the modified PAI radiographic healing criteria. The clinical and radiographic healing classification was as follows: Healed - the tooth was asymptomatic and the radiograph showed PAI 1 or 2 Healing - the tooth was asymptomatic and the radiograph showed PAI 3 or 4, with score improved at follow up from immediate post-treatment radiograph Not healed - the tooth was either symptomatic or the tooth was asymptomatic but the radiograph presented no decrease or an increase in the size of the pre-existing radiolucency at follow up from immediate post-treatment radiograph (PAI 3-5).; The treatment outcome was assessed according to the last follow-up data. And all analyses were performed according to the last follow-up data.