Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03983850
NCT03983850
Active, not recruiting
Phase 1

Phase I/II Study De-intensifying Exposure of Post-transplantation Cyclophosphamide as GVHD Prophylaxis After HLA-haploidentical Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation for Hematologic Malignancies

National Cancer Institute (NCI)1 site in 1 country105 target enrollmentJuly 9, 2019

Overview

Phase
Phase 1
Intervention
Fludarabine
Conditions
Graft Versus Host Disease
Sponsor
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
Enrollment
105
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
aGVHD protection from a reduced duration of MMF, in combination with PTCy 25 mg/kg/day
Status
Active, not recruiting
Last Updated
4 months ago

Overview

Brief Summary

Background:

Stem cell or bone marrow transplants can cure or control blood cancers. Sometimes the donor cells see the recipient's body as foreign. This can cause complications. A high dose of the drug cyclophosphamide (PTCy) can help reduce these risks. Researchers want to see if a lower dose of PTCy can have the same benefits. Based on encouraging results from the first part of the study, researchers now are investigating whether a lower dose of PTCy can allow other immunosuppression to be decreased.

Objective:

To see if a lower dose of PTCy and now also shorter duration of another immunosuppressant called mycophenolate mofetil will help people with blood cancers have a more successful transplant and fewer side effects.

Eligibility:

People ages 15-65 with leukemia, lymphoma, or multiple myeloma that is not curable with standard therapy and is at high risk of returning without transplant, and their healthy adult relatives

Design:

Transplant participants will be screened with:

Blood, urine, breathing, and heart tests

Scans

Chest x-ray

Bone marrow samples: A needle inserted into the participant s pelvis will remove marrow and a bone fragment.

Transplant recipients will stay at the hospital and be prepped with chemotherapy over 6 days for the transplant. They will get stem cells through a catheter in the chest or neck. They will get the cyclophosphamide chemotherapy. They will stay in the hospital about 4 more weeks. They will have blood transfusions. They will have frequent blood tests and 2 bone marrow samples within 1 year after the transplant.

Donor participants will be screened with:

Blood, urine, and heart tests

Chest x-ray

Scans

Donor participants will have bone marrow taken from their pelvis or stem cells taken from their blood. For the blood donation, blood will be taken from a vein in one arm, move through a machine to remove white blood cells, and be returned through a vein in the other arm.

Participation will last up to 5 years....

Detailed Description

Background: Post-transplantation cyclophosphamide (PTCy) reduces rates of severe acute and chronic graft-versus-host disease (GVHD) after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) and safely facilitates human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-haploidentical HCT When clinically translated, the dose (50 mg/kg) and timing (days +3 and +4) of PTCy used were partly extrapolated from murine major histocompatibility complex (MHC)-matched skin allografting models and were partly empirical In both MHC-haploidentical and MHC-disparate murine HCT models, a dose of 25 mg/kg/day was superior to 50 mg/kg/day on days +3 and +4 in terms of GVHD severity and mortality In the MHC-haploidentical HCT model, a dose of 25 mg/kg on day +4 was equivalent to 25 mg/kg/day on days +3 and +4 In addition to better GVHD prevention, lower dosing of PTCy is associated with less broad reduction of T-cell numbers after PTCy Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF), used as adjunct immunosuppression with standard dose PTCy, can have substantial gastrointestinal toxicity and can impede immune reconstitution and pathogen-specific immunity. Objectives: Determine whether a dose of PTCy 25 mg/kg on day +3 and +4 or on day +4 only can maintain adequate protection against grade III-IV acute GVHD. Determine whether a reduced duration of MMF, in combination with PTCy 25 mg/kg/day on days +3 and +4, can maintain adequate protection against grade III-IV acute GVHD. Eligibility: Histologically or cytologically confirmed hematologic malignancy with standard indication for allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation including one of the following: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) of intermediate or adverse risk disease by the 2017 European LeukemiaNet criteria in first morphologic complete remission AML of any risk in second or subsequent morphologic complete remission B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia in first or subsequent complete remission T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia with minimal residual disease detected after first line therapy and/or adverse genetics Myelodysplastic syndrome of intermediate or higher score by the Revised International Prognostic Scoring System (IPSS-R) Primary myelofibrosis of intermediate-2 or higher risk by the Dynamic International Prognostic Scoring System (DIPSS) Chronic myelomonocytic leukemia Chronic myelogenous leukemia resistant to or intolerant of \>=3 tyrosine kinase inhibitors or with prior history of accelerated phase or blast crisis B-cell lymphoma including Hodgkin lymphoma that has relapsed within 1 year of completion of primary treatment Chronic lymphocytic leukemia with 17p deletion and/or unmutated IgHV or refractory to or intolerant of both BTK and PI3K inhibitors Mature T or NK neoplasms as defined in the WHO guidelines of sufficient type and severity for allogeneic HCT based on the Prognostic Index for T-cell lymphoma (PIT) score of low-intermediate risk or higher or on recently published clinical practice guidelines Hematologic malignancy of dendritic cell or histiocytic cell type Multiple myeloma, stage III, relapsing after therapy with both a proteasome inhibitor and an immunomodulatory drug (IMiD) Age 15-65. At least one potentially suitable HLA-haploidentical donor. Karnofsky performance score \>=60 Adequate organ function Design: Open-label, single-center, non-randomized, phase I/II study All patients will receive myeloablative conditioning, HLA-haploidentical bone marrow HCT, and GVHD prophylaxis with PTCy, MMF (depending on cohort), and sirolimus. A small pilot of 5 evaluable patients will receive the standard PTCy 50 mg/kg on days +3/+4 to obtain a limited amount of comparative pharmacokinetic and T-cell immunophenotyping and repertoire data. Then the study will proceed to a small, two-level \[1) 25 mg/kg/day on days +3 and +4, 2) 25 mg/kg on day +4 only\] phase I dose de-escalation study based on the standard 3+3 approach Patients will be evaluated for development of grade III-IV acute GVHD (aGVHD) at day +60 as the dose-limiting toxicity and then phase II will proceed with the shorter duration of the days of treatment (+3/+4 or +4) which is associated with 0-1 of 6 patients with grade III-IV aGVHD at day +60 and with the least amount of toxicity Simon optimal two-stage phase II trial design, to rule out excess grade III-IV acute GVHD with this decreased PTCy exposure, will be used in the phase II portion of the study which will enroll an additional 14 patients to see if this lower PTCy exposure is associated with a similar rate of grade III-IV acute GVHD as is expected with 50 mg/kg on days +3/+4 Following completion of the phase II portion of the trial evaluating PTCy 25 mg/kg/day on days +3/+4, a dose de-escalation will be conducted to determine if the dose of MMF (standardly days +5 to +35) may be reduced without meaningful impact on avoidance of grade III-IV acute GVHD. The tested dose levels will be 1) MMF from days +5 to +18 and 2) no MMF. This will be followed by a second Simon optimal two-stage phase II trial design, to rule out excess grade III-IV acute GVHD with decreased MMF exposure, which will expand on the lowest MMF dose that is associated with acceptable toxicity and enroll an additional 14 patients to see if this lower MMF is associated with a similar rate of grade III-IV acute GVHD as is expected with full 30 day MMF treatment.

Registry
clinicaltrials.gov
Start Date
July 9, 2019
End Date
October 26, 2026
Last Updated
4 months ago
Study Type
Interventional
Study Design
Sequential
Sex
All

Investigators

Responsible Party
Sponsor

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Arms & Interventions

Phase I Pilot for Comparative Data

Standard PTCy 50 mg/kg/day on days +3 and +4, in a small pilot (up to 5 evaluable patients) for comparative data

Intervention: Fludarabine

Phase I Dose De-escalation

PTCy at de-escalating doses (25 mg/kg/day on days +3 and +4, and PTCy 25 mg/kg on day +4) to assess for safety and determine Phase II dose (up to 12 evaluable patients)

Intervention: Busulfan

Phase I Dose De-escalation

PTCy at de-escalating doses (25 mg/kg/day on days +3 and +4, and PTCy 25 mg/kg on day +4) to assess for safety and determine Phase II dose (up to 12 evaluable patients)

Intervention: Fludarabine

Phase I Dose De-escalation

PTCy at de-escalating doses (25 mg/kg/day on days +3 and +4, and PTCy 25 mg/kg on day +4) to assess for safety and determine Phase II dose (up to 12 evaluable patients)

Intervention: Cyclophosphamide

Phase I Dose De-escalation

PTCy at de-escalating doses (25 mg/kg/day on days +3 and +4, and PTCy 25 mg/kg on day +4) to assess for safety and determine Phase II dose (up to 12 evaluable patients)

Intervention: Mycophenolate Mofetil

Phase I Dose De-escalation

PTCy at de-escalating doses (25 mg/kg/day on days +3 and +4, and PTCy 25 mg/kg on day +4) to assess for safety and determine Phase II dose (up to 12 evaluable patients)

Intervention: Sirolimus

Phase I duration de-escalation of MMF

MMF at de-escalating duration (days +5 to +18 only, no MMF))

Intervention: Busulfan

Phase I duration de-escalation of MMF

MMF at de-escalating duration (days +5 to +18 only, no MMF))

Intervention: Fludarabine

Phase I duration de-escalation of MMF

MMF at de-escalating duration (days +5 to +18 only, no MMF))

Intervention: Cyclophosphamide

Phase I duration de-escalation of MMF

MMF at de-escalating duration (days +5 to +18 only, no MMF))

Intervention: Mycophenolate Mofetil

Phase I duration de-escalation of MMF

MMF at de-escalating duration (days +5 to +18 only, no MMF))

Intervention: Sirolimus

Phase I Pilot for Comparative Data

Standard PTCy 50 mg/kg/day on days +3 and +4, in a small pilot (up to 5 evaluable patients) for comparative data

Intervention: Busulfan

Phase I Pilot for Comparative Data

Standard PTCy 50 mg/kg/day on days +3 and +4, in a small pilot (up to 5 evaluable patients) for comparative data

Intervention: Cyclophosphamide

Phase I Pilot for Comparative Data

Standard PTCy 50 mg/kg/day on days +3 and +4, in a small pilot (up to 5 evaluable patients) for comparative data

Intervention: Mycophenolate Mofetil

Phase I Pilot for Comparative Data

Standard PTCy 50 mg/kg/day on days +3 and +4, in a small pilot (up to 5 evaluable patients) for comparative data

Intervention: Sirolimus

Phase II Efficacy

PTCy at shortest duration, safe dose (from Phase I) to assess efficacy at providing adequate protection from grade 3-4 acute GVHD (up to 14 additional patients)

Intervention: Busulfan

Phase II Efficacy

PTCy at shortest duration, safe dose (from Phase I) to assess efficacy at providing adequate protection from grade 3-4 acute GVHD (up to 14 additional patients)

Intervention: Fludarabine

Phase II Efficacy

PTCy at shortest duration, safe dose (from Phase I) to assess efficacy at providing adequate protection from grade 3-4 acute GVHD (up to 14 additional patients)

Intervention: Cyclophosphamide

Phase II Efficacy

PTCy at shortest duration, safe dose (from Phase I) to assess efficacy at providing adequate protection from grade 3-4 acute GVHD (up to 14 additional patients)

Intervention: Mycophenolate Mofetil

Phase II Efficacy

PTCy at shortest duration, safe dose (from Phase I) to assess efficacy at providing adequate protection from grade 3-4 acute GVHD (up to 14 additional patients)

Intervention: Sirolimus

Phase II efficacy of reduced duration MMF

MMF at duration identified from de-escalation evaluation.

Intervention: Busulfan

Phase II efficacy of reduced duration MMF

MMF at duration identified from de-escalation evaluation.

Intervention: Fludarabine

Phase II efficacy of reduced duration MMF

MMF at duration identified from de-escalation evaluation.

Intervention: Cyclophosphamide

Phase II efficacy of reduced duration MMF

MMF at duration identified from de-escalation evaluation.

Intervention: Mycophenolate Mofetil

Phase II efficacy of reduced duration MMF

MMF at duration identified from de-escalation evaluation.

Intervention: Sirolimus

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

aGVHD protection from a reduced duration of MMF, in combination with PTCy 25 mg/kg/day

Time Frame: 60 days

The fraction of evaluable patients who experience grade III-IV aGVHD at day +60 will be determined and reported along with 80% and 95% two-sided confidence intervals. The MMF duration level patients may be compared with the PTCy dose level patients which serves as a baseline for standard duration MMF.

aGVHD protection from PTCy 25 mg/kg

Time Frame: 60 days

The fraction of evaluable patients who experience grade III-IV aGVHD at day +60 will be determined and reported along with 80% and 95% two-sided confidence intervals.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Determine, at the PTCy dose or MMF duration used in phase II cohorts, the cumulative incidences(100 days)
  • determine the shortest MMF duration without unacceptable acute GVHD to be used during phase II(60 days)

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials