Skip to main content
MedPathMedPath Home
Clinical Trials/IRCT138812113470N1
IRCT138812113470N1
Completed
Phase 2

Comparison between two types of treatment in pelvic girdle pain in pregnancy: Abdomino lumbo pelvic belt and exercise therapy.

Research Deputy of Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services0 sites44 target enrollmentTBD
Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to LinkedInShare to Reddit

Overview

Phase
Phase 2
Intervention
Not specified
Conditions
Not specified
Sponsor
Research Deputy of Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services
Enrollment
44
Status
Completed
Last Updated
8 years ago
OverviewInvestigatorsEligibility CriteriaOutcomesSimilar Trials

Overview

Brief Summary

No summary available.

Registry
who.int
Start Date
TBD
End Date
TBD
Last Updated
8 years ago
Study Type
Interventional
Sex
Female

Investigators

Sponsor
Research Deputy of Tehran University of Medical Sciences and Health Services

Eligibility Criteria

Inclusion Criteria

  • •1\- Healthy pregnant women with pain in lumbar region.
  • •2\- Pregnancy age: 20\-32 weeks of pregnancy.
  • •3\- The consent will be received from all participants.
  • •4\- Mono fetus pregnancy.
  • •5\- Pelvic girdle pain had been diagnosed with history, physical examination and specific tests.
  • •6\- Contraindications of exercise in pregnancy should not be existed in participants such as: vaginal bleeding, preeclampsia, IURG, placenta previa, preterm labor, cervix insufficiency, rupture of membrane in recent pregnancy.
  • •7\- Systemic diseases should not be existed in participants such as: restrictive lung diseases, heart diseases.
  • •Exclusion criteria:
  • •1\- If contraindications of exercise in pregnancy happened during study.
  • •2\- If participants don’t refer after 3 and 6 weeks of intervention.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Not specified

Similar Trials

Terminated
Not Applicable
Comparative study of the treatment of fallen bladder with internal or external pessaryterine Prolapse
RBR-9hg547mniversity of São Paulo
Completed
Not Applicable
The comparison of two surgery methods for treatment of supracondylar fracture in children under 10 years oldsupracondylar fracture.Osteopathies in diseases classified elsewhere
IRCT201105146480N1Vice chancellor for research, Shahrekord university of medical sciences90
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable
A comparative study of the treatment of pelvic lesions in patients with non-acute low back pain.
KCT0009210Pusan National University Korean Medicine Hospital81
Recruiting
Not Applicable
Pelvic organ prolapse: comparison of two surgical techniques for the treatment of uterine prolapseterine prolapse.Quality of lifeN81.3I01.800
RBR-7t6rg2Hospital da Mulher Prof. Dr. José Aristodemo Pinotti - CAISM
Recruiting
Phase 4
Comparing the effectiveness of two treatment protocols: dexmedetomidine - propofol and midazolam - fentanyl - propofol in relieving pain in patients undergoing extracorporeal stone crusher
IRCT20230701058625N1Dezfoul University of Medical Sciences40