A Chronic Pain Master Protocol (CPMP): A Study of LY3857210 In Participants With Osteoarthritis Pain

Phase 2

Completed

Conditions: Osteoarthritis

Interventions: Drug: Placebo
Drug: LY3857210

Registration Number: NCT05620563

Lead Sponsor: Eli Lilly and Company

Brief Summary: The main purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of LY3857210 in participants with Osteoarthritic Pain. This trial is part of the chronic pain master protocol, H0P-MC-CPMP (NCT05986292), which is a protocol to accelerate the development of new treatments for chronic pain.

Detailed Description: Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: COMPLETED

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 147

Inclusion Criteria

Have a visual analog scale (VAS) pain value ≥40 and <95 during screening.
Have a history of daily pain for at least 12 weeks based on participant report or medical history.
Have a body mass index <40 kilograms per meter squared (kg/m²) (inclusive).
Are willing to maintain a consistent regimen of any ongoing nonpharmacologic pain-relieving therapies (for example, physical therapy) and will not start any new nonpharmacologic pain-relieving therapies during study participation.
Are willing to discontinue all medications taken for chronic pain conditions for the duration of the study.
Have presence of index knee pain for >12 weeks at screening.
Have an x-ray supporting diagnosis of osteoarthritis according to the American College of Rheumatology with a Kellgren-Lawrence grade 2 to 4 radiographic classification of index knee.
Are men, or women able to abide by reproductive and contraceptive requirements.

Exclusion Criteria

A seizure disorder, history of seizure (other than remote history of childhood febrile seizure), or a condition that would place the participant at increased risk of seizure
Have had a procedure within the past 6 months intended to produce permanent sensory loss in the target area of interest (for example, ablation techniques).
Have surgery planned during the study for any reason, related or not to the disease state under evaluation.
Have, in the judgment of the investigator, an acute, serious, or unstable medical condition or a history or presence of any other medical illness that would preclude study participation.
Have had cancer within 2 years of baseline, except for cutaneous basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma resolved by excision.
Have a substance use disorder as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (5th edition; DSM-5; American Psychiatric Association).
Have a positive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) test result at screening.
Are in the judgment of the investigator, actively suicidal and therefore deemed to be at significant risk for suicide.
Have an intolerance to acetaminophen or paracetamol or any of its excipients.
Have a history of alcohol, illicit drug, analgesic or narcotic use disorder within 2 years prior to screening.
Are largely or wholly incapacitated and unable to participate fully in all protocol procedures, for example, bedridden or confined to a wheelchair, permitting little or no selfcare.
Have presence of surgical hardware or other foreign body in the index knee.
Have an unstable index joint (such as a torn anterior cruciate ligament).
Have had a surgical procedure or therapeutic injection in the affected knee within 3 months prior to starting the washout period.
Have fibromyalgia, chronic pain syndrome, or other concurrent medical or arthritic conditions that could interfere with the evaluation of the index knee.
Have a history of Reiter's syndrome, rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, arthritis associated with inflammatory bowel disease, sarcoidosis, or amyloidosis.
Have clinical signs and symptoms of active knee infection or crystal disease of the index knee.
Have a history of infection in the index joint.
Have a history of arthritis due to crystals (e.g., gout, pseudogout).
Have pain or functional impairment due to ipsilateral hip osteoarthritis.
Have had any joint replacement such as knee of the lower extremity, such as hip, knee or ankle, in the past 6 months.
Are pregnant or breastfeeding.

Study & Design

Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Study Design: PARALLEL

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Placebo	Placebo	Participants received placebo orally once daily for up to 8 weeks.
45 mg LY3857210	LY3857210	Participants received 45 milligram (mg) LY3857210 orally once daily for up to 8 weeks.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change From Baseline for Average Pain Intensity as Measured by the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS)	Baseline, Week 8	The NRS was used to describe pain severity. Participants were asked to describe their average pain over the past 24 hours, on a scale of 0 to 10: 0=no pain, and 10=pain as bad as you can imagine. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95 percent (%) credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Change From Baseline on the Western Ontario and McMaster University Arthritis Index (WOMAC®) Pain Subscale	Baseline, Week 8	The WOMAC® is a validated instrument that is extensively used to evaluate the response to medications for the treatment of Osteoarthritis pain. There are 5 questions on the pain subscale, and participants used a 0 to 4 Likert scale to answer each question for the current day: 0 = no pain, and 4 = extreme pain. The scores for the pain subscale were calculated by summing the scores of the 5 questions for each participant at each time point. The range of possible scores is 0 to 20 with higher scores representing worse outcome. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.
Change From Baseline on the WOMAC® Stiffness Subscale	Baseline, Week 8	The WOMAC® is a validated instrument that is extensively used to evaluate the response to medications for the treatment of Osteoarthritis pain. There are 2 questions in the stiffness subscale and participants used a 0 to 4 Likert scale to answer each question for the current day: 0 = no stiffness, and 4 = extreme stiffness. The scores for the stiffness subscale was calculated by summing the scores of the 2 questions for each participant at each time point. The range of possible scores is 0 to 8 with higher scores representing worse outcome. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.
Change From Baseline on the EuroQuality of Life Five Dimensions (5D) Five Level (5L) Questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) Health State Index (United States Algorithm)	Baseline, Week 8	The EQ-5D-5L assessed quality of life based on 5 dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. The participant was asked to 'check the ONE box that best describes your health TODAY,' choosing from 5 options (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems, extreme problems) provided under each dimension. The scores in the 5 dimensions were summarized into a health state index score using the United States algorithm. The health state index value is a single value on a scale from less than 0 to 1 (negative values are valued as worse than dead) with higher scores indicating better health: 0=a health state equivalent to death, and 1=perfect health. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible intervals was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.
Change From Baseline for Worst Pain Intensity as Measured by NRS	Baseline, Week 8	The NRS was used to describe pain severity. Participants were asked to describe their worst pain over the past 24 hours, on a scale of 0 to 10: 0 = no pain, and 10 = pain as bad as you can imagine. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.
Change From Baseline on the Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for Pain	Baseline, Week 8	VAS was a graphic, single-item scale where participants were asked to describe their pain intensity over the past week, on a scale of 0 to 100: 0 = no pain, and 100 = worst imaginable pain. Participants completed the VAS by placing a line perpendicular to the VAS line at a point that described their pain intensity. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.
Change From Baseline on the WOMAC® Physical Function Subscale	Baseline, Week 8	The WOMAC® is a validated instrument that is extensively used to evaluate the response to medications for the treatment of Osteoarthritis pain. There are 17 questions in the physical function subscale, and participants used a 0 to 4 Likert scale to answer each question for the current day: 0 = no difficulty, and 4 = extreme difficulty. The score for physical function subscale was calculated by summing the scores of the 17 questions for each participant at each time point. The range of possible scores is 0 to 68 with higher scores representing worse outcome. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.
Change From Baseline in Overall Improvement as Measured by Patient's Global Impression of Change	Baseline, Week 8	Patient's global impression of change captured the participant's perspective of treatment apart from sub-aspects of the general improvement. This is a numeric scale from 1 to 7: 1 = very much better, and 7 = very much worse. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.
Change From Baseline on the Sleep Scale From the Medical Outcomes Study (MOS Sleep Scale) - Average Hours of Sleep	Baseline, Week 8	The MOS Sleep Scale consists of 12 questions addressing the past week. Question 1 asks time to fall asleep and it is reported in 5-point timeframe categories. Question 2 asks average hours of sleep. In the remaining 10 questions participants report how often a sleep symptom or problem was present on a scale ranging from '0=all of the time' to '5=none of the time.' MOS Sleep scale dimension scores range from 0 to 100 with lower score indicating improvement, except for the dimension of sleep adequacy, where higher scores indicate improvement. Here, the average hours of sleep (i.e., Question 2) is reported as the average number of hours slept each night during the past week (range 0 to 24 hours). Higher number of hours slept indicates improvement. Posterior mean change from baseline, 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.
Total Amount of Rescue Medication Use as Measured by Average Daily Dosage	Week 8	Total amount of rescue medication use as measured by average daily dosage. Posterior mean and 95% credible interval was derived using Bayesian mixed model repeated measures. Data presented are posterior mean with 95% credible interval.

Trial Locations

Locations (27): University of Miami
🇺🇸
Miami, Florida, United States
FutureSearch Trials of Neurology
🇺🇸
Austin, Texas, United States
Northwest Clinical Research Center
🇺🇸
Bellevue, Washington, United States
Ponce Medical School Foundation Inc.
🇵🇷
Ponce, Puerto Rico
Northwestern University
🇺🇸
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Boston Clinical Trials
🇺🇸
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Arizona Research Center
🇺🇸
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
CMR of Greater New Haven, LLC
🇺🇸
Hamden, Connecticut, United States
Suncoast Research Group
🇺🇸
Miami, Florida, United States
Accel Research Sites- Clinical Research Unit
🇺🇸
DeLand, Florida, United States
North Georgia Clinical Research
🇺🇸
Woodstock, Georgia, United States
New Horizon Research Center
🇺🇸
Miami, Florida, United States
Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc - Orlando
🇺🇸
Orlando, Florida, United States
MedVadis Research Corporation
🇺🇸
Waltham, Massachusetts, United States
ActivMed Practices and Research
🇺🇸
Methuen, Massachusetts, United States
Great Lakes Research Group, Inc.
🇺🇸
Bay City, Michigan, United States
META Medical Research Institute
🇺🇸
Dayton, Ohio, United States
StudyMetrix Research
🇺🇸
Saint Peters, Missouri, United States
Lillestol Research
🇺🇸
Fargo, North Dakota, United States
Altoona Center For Clinical Research
🇺🇸
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States
Rainier Clinical Research Center
🇺🇸
Renton, Washington, United States
Renstar Medical Research
🇺🇸
Ocala, Florida, United States
Artemis Institute for Clinical Research
🇺🇸
San Diego, California, United States
Clinvest Research LLC
🇺🇸
Springfield, Missouri, United States
Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc.
🇺🇸
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Rocky Mountain Clinical Research
🇺🇸
Idaho Falls, Idaho, United States
Latin Clinical Trial Center
🇵🇷
San Juan, Puerto Rico