Comparative effectiveness of chlorhexidine gluconate versus normal saline in post oral cavity surgery wound healing of oral cavity cancer patients
Phase 3
Recruiting
- Conditions
- wound healingoral hygiene0.12% chlorhexidine gluconate (c-20)Normal salinepost oral cavity surgery in oral cavity cancer patientsOral cavity surgeryoral cavity cancer
- Registration Number
- TCTR20210826002
- Lead Sponsor
- Ratrchadapiseksompoch fund
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- Recruiting
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 50
Inclusion Criteria
oral cavity cancer patients
oral cavity surgery that has a primary suture and size of the wound more than 2 cm.
Exclusion Criteria
American Society of Anesthesiologist(ASA) physical status classification score more than 3
a patient who has the oral mucosal disease
a patient who has severe ischemic heart disease, renal disease), connective tissue disease, Liver disease, HIV, Diabetics Mellitus poor control
a patient who has coagulation problem or bleeding disorders (Platelet <50,000 or PT, APTT> 1.5x normal control or INR>1.5)
allergy to chlorhexidine
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Comparative effectiveness of chlorhexidine gluconate versus normal saline in post oral cavity surgery wound healing of oral cavity cancer patients at 3, 14 days after surgery Wound healing : IPR wound healing scale
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Comparative complication of chlorhexidine gluconate versus normal saline in post oral cavity surgery wound healing of oral cavity cancer patients at 3, 14 days after surgery Pain score (VAS) Side effect : irritation/allergy/hypogeusia/brown straining of the dentition