跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2024/05/067392
CTRI/2024/05/067392尚未招募不适用

A Randomised crossover trial to compare the accuracy and patient comfort between conventional and digital impression techniques in children with multibracket appliance

Saveetha Institute of Medical and Technical Sciences1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 46 人开始时间: 2024年5月27日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
46
试验地点
1
主要终点
To compare Digital and conventional impression techniques with respect to the pain, comfort, gag reflex and preference in young patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with multibracket appliance

研究概览

简要总结

Orthodontic treatment with fixed appliances is done to correct malocclusions. To assess the progress of treatment, mid stage records are made routinely. The records include photographs, radiographs, and models. The models are usually made using Alginate material impression. Due to advancement in 3D digital technology, intra oral scanners are now currently used in the market as it possesses several advantages over the conventional method of taking impression. There are previous studies that have compared the conventional and digital impression techniques, however without the appliance in the oral cavity. The effect of appliance in the oral cavity on the comfort of the impression technique has not been studied extensively. The current study is primarily aimed at comparing the patient comfort and preference between conventional method of taking impression versus digital technique in young children with orthodontic brackets. The study also aims to compare the accuracy of the models generated by the two techniques.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
盲法
Outcome Assessor Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
12.00 Year(s) 至 18.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with multibracket appliance.
  • All the tooth has been bonded.

排除标准

  • Patients with craniofacial syndromes, pathologies and diseases
  • Multiple missing teeth and supernumerary teeth.
  • Sectional bracketing with any other orthodontic appliance placed in conjunction with routine fixed appliance.

结局指标

主要结局

To compare Digital and conventional impression techniques with respect to the pain, comfort, gag reflex and preference in young patients undergoing orthodontic treatment with multibracket appliance

时间窗: Baseline and after 1 week

次要结局

  • To compare the accuracy of the impression made using conventional and digital methods(Baseline and after 1 week)

研究者

申办方类型
Research institution and hospital
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Shweta Nagesh

Saveetha Dental College

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验