Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT03636178
NCT03636178UnknownNot Applicable

Three Dimensional Evaluation of Nasolabial Changes Following Classic Versus Modified Alar Base Suture After Le Fort I Osteotomy

Cairo University0 sites40 target enrollmentStarted: September 2018Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Enrollment
40
Primary Endpoint
Widening of the alar base

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Three dimensional evaluation of nasolabial changes following classic versus modified alar cinch suture after Le Fort I osteotomy using cone beam computed tomography

Detailed Description

Intra operative procedures: (For all groups) All surgical operations will be performed or supervised by one of the authors (MdK). Intraoperative antibiotics will be given(1000 mg cefazolin and 500 mg metronidazole). After nasotracheal intubation, the mucobuccal fold of the maxilla will be infiltrated with local anaesthetic (articaine ; Ultracain DS Forte). The Le Fort I procedure will be started with an incision in the gingivobuccal sulcus from the canine on the one side to the canine on the other side. After elevation of the mucoperiosteum and nasal mucosa, the osteotomy line will be designed with a fine burr, after which the cut will be made with a reciprocal saw. The lateral nasal walls and nasal septum will be osteotomized with a nasal osteotome. The piriform aperture and when necessary the nasal spine will be rounded off. After mobilization of the maxilla, it will be positioned in the planned position using an acrylic wafer. Fixation will be performed with four 1.5-mm miniplates, one paranasal and one on the buttress on each side. The mucosa will be closed with a 4-0 Vicryl suture (Ethicon ; Johnson and Johnson Medical, Norderstedt, Germany).

The alar cinch procedure will be performed through the intraoral incision as follows:

In the comparator ( control ) group:

The classic method of alar cinching will be performed in the following manner: An index finger will be used to apply extraoral pressure on the alar base region, and a dentate forceps will grasp this tissue through the intraoral incision. A suture bite will be taken at this point through the tissue previously held by the forceps. The same procedure will be applied on the opposite side. After passing the suture on both sides, it will be tightened with attention to the alar base response. If the alar base suture will be judged to be adequate, the vestibular incision will then be closed in a routine fashion, with or without performing a V-Y lip closure.

In the intervention group:

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Prevention
Masking
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

Masking Description

Double blind clinical trial

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Yes

Inclusion Criteria

  • Adult patients with skeletal maxillomandibular deformity indicated for surgical correction by Le Fort I osteotomy.
  • Absence of clefts.
  • Absence of growth.
  • Patients must be willing for the surgical procedure and follow-up, with his informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

  • History of facial trauma with fractures of facial bones.
  • History of surgical operation in nasal region.
  • Facial asymmetry.
  • Patients with accompanying craniofacial syndromes.
  • Patients with any diseases that compromise bone or soft tissue healing.
  • Anterior open bite cases
  • Medically compromised patients not fit for general anaesthesia.

Arms & Interventions

1st group

Other

20 patients out of 40 will be enrolled into the study including males and females above 18 years old

Intervention: Classic alar base suture technique (Procedure)

2nd group

Other

20 patients out of 40 will be enrolled in the study including males and females above 18 years old

Intervention: Modified alar base suture technique (Procedure)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Widening of the alar base

Time Frame: 6 months postoperatively

Postoperative increase in the alar base width in millimeters(mm) in comparison to the normal preoperative alar base width

Secondary Outcomes

  • Nasal volume(6 months postoperatively)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Amr Samy

Oral and Maxillofacial surgeon

Cairo University

Similar Trials