MedPath

Osteopathic Treatment on Motor Development of Hypotonic Infants.

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Hypotonia
Interventions
Other: simulated osteopathic treatment
Other: ostheopathy
Registration Number
NCT03852004
Lead Sponsor
Centre Hospitalier Intercommunal Creteil
Brief Summary

Interventional study involving the human at risk and minimal constraint (RIPH2), randomized single-blind comparing the impact of osteopathic treatment on the axial tone of the hypotonic infant versus simulation

Detailed Description

Children referred to the "Center Broussais" clinic for hypotonia are evaluated in terms of psychomotor development by a pediatrician competent in neuro-pediatrics. It is a cabinet for the care of children from 0 to 16 years.

Osteopaths and pediatricians work together in this office of which 50% are children with neurological disorders.

If osteopathic care is indicated, and for children with inclusion / non-inclusion criteria, the study will be offered to parents. In case of parental acceptance, children will be randomized in single blind to receive either an osteopathic treatment (osteo group) or a simulation (simulation group). Neither the parents nor the pediatrician will know the randomization group.

The osteopathic treatment or simulation will be performed in a standardized way according to a previously established protocol.

In both groups, a neurological evaluation of the axial tone will be performed by a pediatrician before randomization, at the end of the first consultation and at the end of the 3rd consultation, ie 3 consultations by a pediatrician.

If the child was drawn in the "simulation" group, three additional consultations will be offered at the end of the study to allow him to benefit from optimal osteopathic care

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
40
Inclusion Criteria

Age: 8 months-24 months corrected age Axial hypotonia in the neurological examination

  • Age (age corrected for prematurity) of motor development evaluated on the Denver II scale below chronological age
  • Proposal for osteopathic treatment by the pediatrician or treating physician
Exclusion Criteria
  • • Fever, shock or recent fall (face, skull, spine) not medically investigated, persistent cyanosis, bulging or depressed fontanel, cervical stiffness, fever

    • Neuromuscular diseases without axial hypotonia
    • Not affiliated to a social security scheme
    • Refusal to participate in the study by parents

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
simulated osteopathic treatmentsimulated osteopathic treatmentA simulated ostepathic treatment will be realised by osteopath
Osteopatic treatmentostheopathyAn osteopatic treatment will be realised by osteopath
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Motor development on the Denver II scaleat month 6

Comparison of the difference between chronological age (in corrected age) and motor development age on the Denver II motor scale in the 2 groups after 3 osteopathy consultations or simulation

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Motor development on the Denver II scaleat month 4
Satisfaction visual scale (from 0 to 10)at month 6

comparison of parents satisfaction with a visual analogic scale in the 2 groups

Trial Locations

Locations (2)

CHI Creteil

🇫🇷

Créteil, France

Centre Broussais

🇫🇷

Paris, France

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath