MedPath

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy or Chemoradiotherapy in Resectable Oesophageal Carcinoma(NewEC Study)

Completed
Conditions
Radiotherapy Side Effect
Chemotherapy Effect
Oesophageal Carcinoma
Effect of Drugs
Safety Issues
Interventions
Combination Product: Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy
Drug: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy
Procedure: Oesophagectomy
Registration Number
NCT04027543
Lead Sponsor
Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University
Brief Summary

To provide comprehensive efficacy and safety profiles of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) versus surgery alone in resectable oesophageal carcinoma.

Detailed Description

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NCT) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) has been shown to be better than surgery alone in patients with resectable oesophageal carcinoma, but higher quality evidence is needed as new findings have emerged regarding this issue.Previous evidence-based findings and the current guidelines have not established a survival advantage of NCRT over NCT or an acceptable safety profile of the addition of radiotherapy to NCT; whether NCRT or NCT is more effective for the treatment of adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus is unclear.This study aims to provide comprehensive efficacy and safety profiles of NCRT versus NCT versus surgery alone in resectable oesophageal carcinoma.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
423
Inclusion Criteria
  • Patients with histologically documented untreated SCC or adenocarcinoma of the oesophagus or gastro-oesophageal junction.
  • Patients clinically staged as stage I-III (T1-3, N0-1 and M0) as assessed by a contrast-enhanced multislice computed tomography (CT) scan, positron emission tomography, or endoscopic ultrasonography.
  • Patients had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 to 2.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patients had received any previous treatment for oesophageal cancer.
  • Patients who were unsuitable for surgery because of comorbidities.
  • Patients had evidence of distant metastatic disease by history and physical examination.

Study & Design

Study Type
OBSERVATIONAL
Study Design
Not specified
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapyNeoadjuvant chemoradiotherapyPatients who had chemoradiotherapy before surgery.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapyNeoadjuvant chemotherapyPatients who had chemotherapy before surgery.
Surgery aloneOesophagectomyPatients who only had oesophagectomy. Various surgical oesophagectomy methods were used, such as Ivor Lewis, transthoracic, three-hole, transhiatal, and left transthoracic. The appropriate surgical approach for each patient was chosen according to the tumour location, size, and depth.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Overall survival (OS)5 years

The OS was calculated as the time from the date of the histologically documented diagnosis to the date of death or the final follow-up.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Disease-free survival (DFS)5 years

DFS was calculated from the date of R0 resection to the date of disease recurrence or death from any cause

R0 resection rateBaseline

R0 resection was defined as gross disease removed with negative margins (tumour-free resection margin).

Pathologic complete response (pCR)Baseline

pCR was defined as no evidence of residual tumour cells in the primary site and resected lymph nodes of the operative specimens.

30-day postoperative or in-hospital mortality30 days

Trial Locations

Locations (3)

Massachusetts General Hospital of Harvard Medical School

🇺🇸

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital

🇨🇳

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University

🇨🇳

Guangzhou, Guangdong, China

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath