Radioaerossol Pulmonary Deposition Using Mesh in Normal Subjects
- Conditions
- Normal Subjects
- Interventions
- Other: Jet nebulizerOther: Mesh nebulizerOther: Noninvasive ventilation-NIV
- Registration Number
- NCT01889524
- Lead Sponsor
- Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
- Brief Summary
In vivo deposition studies of aerosol administration during noninvasive ventilation are scarce in the current literature.
We assessed 10 normal subjects in a crossover study evaluated by pulmonary scintigraphy aiming to compare radiaoaerosol pulmonary index and radioaerosol mass balance in the different compartments (pulmonary and extrapulmonary) of radiotagged aerosol administered using vibrating mesh nebulizers (VMN) and conventional jet nebulizer (JN) during noninvasive ventilation (NIV).
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 10
- No history of lung disease;
- Forced vital capacity (FVC) or forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) higher or equal to 80% from predicted values (Pereira et al., 1992),
- No history of smoking;
- Without respiratory or cardiovascular disease;
- Ability to understand verbal commands;
- Willing to provide signed consent to participate in this study.
- Pregnant;
- Were unable to tolerate NIV (Metha and Hill, 2001).
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description NIV plus jet Jet nebulizer Noninvasive ventilation-NIV plus jet nebulizer NIV plus jet Noninvasive ventilation-NIV Noninvasive ventilation-NIV plus jet nebulizer NIV plus Mesh Mesh nebulizer Noninvasive ventilation- NIV plus Mesh nebulizer NIV plus Mesh Noninvasive ventilation-NIV Noninvasive ventilation- NIV plus Mesh nebulizer
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Radioaerosol deposition index 4 m Inhalation was performed using diethilene triamine penta-acetic technetium (99mTc-DTPA) with radioactivity of 25 millicuries (Nobre et al., 2007). Both nebulizers were charged with 2.5 mg of salbutamol and 0.25 mg of ipratropium bromide and normal saline solution to complete a fill volume of 3 mL. The JN (Misty Max, Air Life, Yorba Linda, USA) with a particle MMAD of 5 µm (according to the manufacturer information) was positioned in the circuit using a "T" piece placed between the circuit leak and the mask, and operated with oxygen flow at 8 L/min. VMN (NIVO, Respironics®, Murrysville, Pennsylvania, USA) with an MMAD of 3.0 µm was placed in the elbow adapter at the mask.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Radioaerosol mass balance in pulmonary and extrapulmonary compartments 4 m the same procedure was performed to analysis deposition in the nebulizer, circuits, inspiratory filter, expiratory filter and face mask. Counts representing stomach were obtained from posterior thorax and corrections for decay of technetium were used during extrapulmonary measurements. The analysis of deposition in pulmonary and extrapulmonary compartments was expressed as a percentage from the cumulative count in each compartment representing the total radioaerosol mass.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Hospital das Clínicas
🇧🇷Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil