MedPath

Radioaerossol Pulmonary Deposition Using Mesh in Normal Subjects

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Normal Subjects
Interventions
Other: Jet nebulizer
Other: Mesh nebulizer
Other: Noninvasive ventilation-NIV
Registration Number
NCT01889524
Lead Sponsor
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
Brief Summary

In vivo deposition studies of aerosol administration during noninvasive ventilation are scarce in the current literature.

We assessed 10 normal subjects in a crossover study evaluated by pulmonary scintigraphy aiming to compare radiaoaerosol pulmonary index and radioaerosol mass balance in the different compartments (pulmonary and extrapulmonary) of radiotagged aerosol administered using vibrating mesh nebulizers (VMN) and conventional jet nebulizer (JN) during noninvasive ventilation (NIV).

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
10
Inclusion Criteria
  • No history of lung disease;
  • Forced vital capacity (FVC) or forced expiratory volume in the first second (FEV1) higher or equal to 80% from predicted values (Pereira et al., 1992),
  • No history of smoking;
  • Without respiratory or cardiovascular disease;
  • Ability to understand verbal commands;
  • Willing to provide signed consent to participate in this study.
Exclusion Criteria
  • Pregnant;
  • Were unable to tolerate NIV (Metha and Hill, 2001).

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
NIV plus jetJet nebulizerNoninvasive ventilation-NIV plus jet nebulizer
NIV plus jetNoninvasive ventilation-NIVNoninvasive ventilation-NIV plus jet nebulizer
NIV plus MeshMesh nebulizerNoninvasive ventilation- NIV plus Mesh nebulizer
NIV plus MeshNoninvasive ventilation-NIVNoninvasive ventilation- NIV plus Mesh nebulizer
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Radioaerosol deposition index4 m

Inhalation was performed using diethilene triamine penta-acetic technetium (99mTc-DTPA) with radioactivity of 25 millicuries (Nobre et al., 2007). Both nebulizers were charged with 2.5 mg of salbutamol and 0.25 mg of ipratropium bromide and normal saline solution to complete a fill volume of 3 mL. The JN (Misty Max, Air Life, Yorba Linda, USA) with a particle MMAD of 5 µm (according to the manufacturer information) was positioned in the circuit using a "T" piece placed between the circuit leak and the mask, and operated with oxygen flow at 8 L/min. VMN (NIVO, Respironics®, Murrysville, Pennsylvania, USA) with an MMAD of 3.0 µm was placed in the elbow adapter at the mask.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Radioaerosol mass balance in pulmonary and extrapulmonary compartments4 m

the same procedure was performed to analysis deposition in the nebulizer, circuits, inspiratory filter, expiratory filter and face mask. Counts representing stomach were obtained from posterior thorax and corrections for decay of technetium were used during extrapulmonary measurements. The analysis of deposition in pulmonary and extrapulmonary compartments was expressed as a percentage from the cumulative count in each compartment representing the total radioaerosol mass.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Hospital das Clínicas

🇧🇷

Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath