跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06284018
NCT06284018已完成不适用

Effect of Progressive Muscle Relaxation Exercises Versus Pilates Exercises on Postnatal Low Back Pain

Cairo University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 60 人开始时间: 2024年2月24日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
60
试验地点
2
主要终点
Pressure Algometer

研究概览

简要总结

This study was conducted to compare between the effect of progressive muscle relaxation exercises and the effect of pilates exercises on postnatal low back pain

详细描述

Ethical approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of the Faculty of Physical Therapy, Cairo University, before starting this study [No: P.T.REC/012/003885]. The study's protocol was explained in detail to each woman who signed an informed consent form before starting this study. This work adhered to the principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki for the ethical conduct of research involving human subjects. It was carried out from June till September 2023

Sample Size Calculation:

Based on a pilot study, sample size was calculated according to the significant difference in the value of mean difference (pretreatments - post treatment values) of pain pressure algometer between progressive muscle relaxation exercises (2.01 ± 0.39) and pilates exercises (2.90 ± 0.24) groups in unpaired t test, with α=0.05, power of 80%, and an effect size of 0.74. So a sample size of 30 patients/per group would be required and increased to 35 women to allow for a 15% dropout rate (GPower 301 http:www.psycho.uni-duesseldorf.de) Randomization of sample selection was achieved using closed envelop way. Classification of the sample by simple random way into two groups equal in number, by using sixty closed envelop, each thirty envelop contained a name of a group from the two groups (Group A) or (Group B) and asking each woman to choose one envelop from them, each woman attended to the group according the name of the group written in her envelop. After randomization, they were divided into two groups equal in number

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
25 Years 至 35 Years(Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • ages were ranged from 25 to 35 years old and their body mass index (BMI) did not exceed 30kg/m
  • They were postnatal by three months. The number of parity of all women was ranged from (1-3) times.

排除标准

  • previous trauma to the spine, pelvis and lower limbs,
  • previous history of spinal surgery (such as spinal fusion surgery, vertebroplasty, or - --kyphoplasty), congenital spinal deformities, history of spinal tumors, ankylosing spondylitis, osteoporosis other spondyloarthritis

结局指标

主要结局

Pressure Algometer

时间窗: period of treatment was 4 weeks

Assessment of pressure pain thresholds is a valid and reliable clinical tool to evaluate the subjective perception of pain in response to application of pressure in low back pain patient. Pressure algometry is used in manual therapy to objectively quantify the pressure pain thresholds and it was shown that a predictable variation exists across various spinal levels from cervical to lumbar levels. The examiner determined the main 4 points of assessment (5 cm lateral to the spinous process of L3 and L5 bilaterally), the force of PA was gradually increased at a rate of 1 kg/s, by silently counting seconds while increasing pressure, then the patient was asked to tell the examiner when the pressure became painful while the examiner applied the pressure on the assessment points

次要结局

  • Oswestry Disability Index(period of treatment was 4 weeks)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Nourhan Ahmed Safy Eldeen Mahmoud

principal investigator

Cairo University

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验