MedPath

A Comparative Study of an Integrated Pharmaceutical Care Plan and a Routine Care in Bronchial Asthma

Not Applicable
Completed
Conditions
Bronchial Asthma
Interventions
Other: Pharmacist- Intervention
Other: Routine Care
Registration Number
NCT02046759
Lead Sponsor
Ain Shams University
Brief Summary

The aim of the study is to compare the effect of asthma care by clinical pharmacist intervention versus routine care on asthma control.

Detailed Description

Not available

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
80
Inclusion Criteria
  • patient with clinical diagnosis of bronchial asthma
  • responsible for administering their own asthma medications.
Exclusion Criteria
  • patients who were not responsible for administering their own asthma medications.
  • patients with cognitive defects, other pulmonary disease e.g. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD), experiencing illness with asthma-like symptoms e.g. Congestive Heart Failure, evidence of fixed airway obstruction
  • patients unavailable for 2-month follow-up.
  • patients who did not provide written informed consent.

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Pharmacist-InterventionPharmacist- Intervention-
Routine CareRoutine Care-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Asthma Control Questionnaireat baseline & after 2 months of therapy
Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Number of ER visits/ HospitalizationDuring 2 months of therapy
Forced Expiratory Volume in 1 second (FEV1%)at baseline & after 2 months of therapy
Rescue Medication SABA (number of puffs used most days)at baseline & after 2 months of therapy
Inhaled Corticosteroid Use (number of puffs used/day)at baseline & after 2 months of therapy
Number of courses of systemic steroid usedDuring 2 months of therapy

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Ain Shams University Hospitals

🇪🇬

Cairo, Egypt

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath