Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT04212273
NCT04212273RecruitingNot Applicable

A Single-center, Prospective Controlled Study of the Diagnostic Efficacies of Sonazoid-CEUS and EOB-MRI in Patients With High Risk of HCC

Tianjin Third Central Hospital1 site in 1 country200 target enrollmentStarted: December 21, 2019Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Recruiting
Enrollment
200
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of Sonazoid-CEUS and EOB-MRI

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the fifth most common cancer. Patients with HCCs usually have a poor prognosis. Hepatocarcinogenesis is an intricate and multistep process. Detecting and staging early HCC in patients with liver cirrhosis are still challenging for imaging techniques. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) and gadoxetic acid-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (EOB-MRI) are widely used in clinical practice. EOB-MRI has advantages of high detecting rate for small lesions, high sensitivity of hepatobiliary phase and extensive image information. Sonazoid has the advantage of offering a unique post-vascular phase, also called the Kupffer phase. Therefore, malignant tumors with few or no Kupffer cells appear as contrast defects, with respect to the relatively well-enhanced surrounding liver in the postvascular phase. The diagnostic efficacies of these two imaging methods have not been well studied. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to compare the efficacies of Sonazoid-CEUS and EOB-MRI in patients with high risk of HCC, and to compare the detection ability for malignant tumors by Kupffer phase and hepatobiliary phase.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Na
Intervention Model
Single Group
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • •Patients are at high risk for HCC.
  • •The ages of patients are between 18 and
  • •Patients are with solid liver lesion(s) detected by US: if a patient has a solitary tumor, the size of the tumor is less than or equal to 5 cm; if a patient has multiple lesions, the sizes of the tumors are less than or equal to 3 cm and the number of lesions is less than or equal to
  • •Patient is able and willing to receive CEUS and EOB-MRI examinations within 30 days.
  • •Patient signs the informed consent. -

Exclusion Criteria

  • •Patient is with lesions confirmed by pathology or follow-up, or hemangiomas.
  • •Patient is with lesions already undergoing local treatment, including thermal ablation or TACE.
  • •Patient is with severe cardiopulmonary insufficiency.
  • •Patient is a pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  • •Patient is considered to be unsuitable to participate in the study.

Arms & Interventions

Diagnostic Sonazoid-CEUS and EOB-MRI

Experimental

Patients with high risk of HCC having suspicious lesions on US will receive Sonazoid-CEUS and EOB-MRI examinations.

Intervention: Diagnostic Sonazoid-CEUS and EOB-MRI (Diagnostic Test)

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of Sonazoid-CEUS and EOB-MRI

Time Frame: 6 to 12 months

The sensitivity, specificity and accuracy of Sonazoid-CEUS and EOB-MRI in the diagnosis for patients with high risk of HCC will be determined.

Secondary Outcomes

  • The detection rate of the additionally found HCC(6 to 12 months)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Sponsor

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials