MedPath

Study of the 2.25mm Sirolimus-Eluting Stent in the Treatment of Patients With Coronary Artery Lesions

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Coronary Artery Disease
Interventions
Device: CYPHER Sirolimus-eluting Coronary Stent
Registration Number
NCT00232739
Lead Sponsor
Cordis Corporation
Brief Summary

The main objective of this study is to assess the safety and effectiveness of the sirolimus-eluting Bx VELOCITYTM stent in reducing in-lesion restenosis in patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions.

Detailed Description

This is a multicenter (approximately 10 - 14 sites), prospective, non-randomized study. The study is designed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the sirolimus-eluting Bx VELOCITYTM stent in patients with de novo native coronary artery lesions. A total of 100 patients will be entered in the study. Patients who meet the eligibility criteria will be enrolled into the study. Patients will be followed at 30 days, 6, 9, and 12 months, and at 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-procedure, with all patients undergoing repeat angiography at 6 months. Approximately 50 patients will be required to have an intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) procedure at baseline and at the 6-month angiographic follow-up.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
All
Target Recruitment
100
Inclusion Criteria
  1. Male or non-pregnant female patients minimum 18 years of age
  2. Diagnosis of angina pectoris as defined by Canadian Cardiovascular Society Classification (CCS I, II, III, IV) OR unstable angina pectoris (Braunwald Classification B&C, I-II) OR patients with documented silent ischemia;
  3. Target lesion is 20mm in length (visual estimate);
  4. Target lesion stenosis is >50% and <100% (visual estimate);
Exclusion Criteria
  1. Patient has experienced a Q-wave or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction with documented total CK >2 times normal within the preceding 24 hours and the CK and CK-MB enzymes remains above normal at the time of treatment;
  2. Has unstable angina classified as Braunwald III B or C, or is having a peri infarction;
  3. Documented Left ventricular ejection fraction 25%;
  4. Impaired renal function (creatinine > 3.0 mg/dl) at the time of treatment;

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
SINGLE_GROUP
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
1CYPHER Sirolimus-eluting Coronary Stent-
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Percentage of Participants Who Experienced In-lesion Restenosis as Measured by Quantitative Coronary Angiography (QCA) at 6 Months Post-procedureFrom post-procedure to 6 months

In-lesion restenosis was defined as over 50 percent diameter stenosis either within the stented segment or within 5 mm proximal or distal to the stent edges at a qualifying follow-up angiogram.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Cumulative Percentages of Participants Who Experienced Any Major Adverse Cardiac Events up to Each Scheduled Follow-upFrom post-procedure to 4 years

The percentages are cumulative up to each of the scheduled post-procedure follow-up: 30 days, 6, 9, and 12 months, and 2, 3, 4 and 5 years. Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) consists of death, Myocardial Infarction (Q-wave and Non Q-wave), emergent Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) or Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR).

Percentage of Participants Who Experienced Any Angiographic In-stent Binary Restenosis up to 6 Months Post-procedure.From post-procedure to 6 months

In-stent restenosis was defined as greater than or equal 50 percent diameter stenosis within the stented segment at a qualifying follow-up angiogram.

Average In-stent and In-lesion Minimum Lesion Diameters (MLD) at 6 Months Post-procedure.From post-procedure to 6 months
Cumulative Percentages of Participants Who Experienced Any Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) up to 6 and 9 Months Post-procedure.From post-procedure to 6 months and 9 months

TLR was defined as any "clinically-driven" repeat percutaneous intervention of the target lesion or bypass surgery of the target vessel.

Cumulative Percentages of Participants Who Experienced Any Target Vessel Revascularization (TVR) up to 6 and 9 Months Post-procedure.From post-procedure to 6 months and 9 months follow-up

TVR was defined as any clinically driven repeat percutaneous intervention of the target vessel or bypass surgery of the target vessel. Clinically-driven revascularizations were those in which the patient has a positive functional study, ischemic ECG changes at rest in a distribution consistent with the target vessel, or ischemic symptoms, and an in-lesion diameter stenosis being greater than or equal to 50 percent measured by QCA.

Cumulative Percentages of Participants Who Experienced Any Target Vessel Failure (TVF) up to 6 and 9 Months Post-procedureFrom post-procedure to 6 months and 9 months follow-up

TVF was defined as any Target vessel revascularization, Q wave or non-Q wave MI, or cardiac death that could not be clearly attributed to a vessel other than the target vessel.

Average Lumen Volume (mm3) at Post-procedureAt Post-procedure
Average Stent Obstruction Volume at Post-procedureAt post-procedure

Stent obstruction Volume equals 100 \* \[1-(lumen volume/baseline stent volume)\]; usually this is equal to zero at baseline, since the stent is freshly implanted and no obstruction is expected

Average Lumen Volume (mm3) at 6 Months Post-procedureFrom post-procedure to 6 months
Average Stent Obstruction Volume at 6 Months Post-procedureFrom post-procedure to 6 months
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Lesion Success at Post-procedureAt post-procedure

Lesion success defined as the attainment of \<50 percent residual stenosis (by QCA) using any percutaneous method

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Device Success at Post-procedureAt post-procedure

Device success was defined as achievement of a final residual diameter stenosis of less than 50 percent as measured by QCA, using the assigned device only. If QCA is not available, the visual estimate of diameter stenosis is used

Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Procedure Success Before Hospital DischargeFrom post-procedure to hospital discharge

Procedure success defined as achievement of a final diameter stenosis of less than 50 percent (by QCA) using any percutaneous method, without the occurrence of death, MI, or repeat revascularization of the target lesion during the hospital stay

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Lenox Hill Hospital

🇺🇸

New York, New York, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath