The Care After Life-threatening Medical Events Study

Not Applicable

Completed

Conditions: Cardiac Arrest
Fear

Interventions: Behavioral: Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback Training

Registration Number: NCT04589559

Lead Sponsor: Columbia University

Brief Summary: This study tests the feasibility of a home-based heart rate variability biofeedback (HRVB) intervention in survivors of cardiac arrest (CA). Specifically, the primary purpose of this pilot study is to assess feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, usability, and compliance for an at-home, 3-week HRVB intervention in 10 participants. The study also tests whether cardiac-related interoceptive fear, trait anxiety, and negative affect decrease among CA survivors completing the HRVB intervention.

Detailed Description: HRV biofeedback is a technique that combines slow paced breathing with the use of accurate, moment-to-moment physiological monitoring. The goal is to make internal cardiac information available to people in order to help them learn how to increase the beat-to-beat variability in their heart's activity and thereby increase parasympathetic activity of the autonomic nervous system. Apart from active interventions such as exercise training that reliably increase HRV but that may be inappropriate for many cardiac patients, HRV biofeedback is an easy-to-implement technique which allows people to monitor and then ultimately alter their parasympathetic activity.

Research is needed to determine whether HRV biofeedback training has beneficial consequences for mental and cardiovascular health in patients who have experienced serious, life-threatening cardiac events. The investigator believes that cardiac arrest survivors, in particular, may stand to benefit from such an intervention because many of them experience clinically significant psychological distress after their medical event.

Distressed cardiac patients may be especially motivated to learn to influence their own heart activity in order to improve their own HRV, reduce their cardiovascular risk, and lessen their symptoms of psychological distress. Therefore, it may be wise to harness this motivation in the service of helping these patients deliberately learn to alter their own autonomic activity rather than simply breathing at a rate that automatically improves HRV without any learning process. By providing patients with an external (e.g., visual) form of feedback about their otherwise largely inaccessible autonomic physiology (i.e., vagus nerve activity), the investigator will conduct a feasibility study of HRV biofeedback training with the goal of increasing HRV and reducing anxiety symptoms.

The purpose of this pilot study is to examine the feasibility of enrolling 10 participants and assessing the feasibility, acceptability, appropriateness, and usability of the at-home, multi-week HRV biofeedback training as well as participants' compliance with the intervention. Additionally, the purpose of the study is to assess whether participants generally show a decrease in cardiac-related interoceptive fear, a decrease in trait anxiety, a decrease in negative affect, and an increase in HRV during the course of the study. The data collected from participants as part of this feasibility pilot will influence the decision to continue with a larger randomized clinical trial using the methods in this pilot together with a control group. Progress will be monitored with Polar H10 heart rate monitor - a supremely precise heart rate sensor that comes with the Polar Pro chest strap. It will be used with a smartphone app Elite HRV - which is non-experimental.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status: COMPLETED

Sex: All

Target Recruitment: 10

Inclusion Criteria

Age 18 years or older
Fluent in English
A diagnosis of cardiac arrest (CA)
Time elapsed since their CA is less than 72 months
Elevated post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptom total scores on the 17-item Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder Checklist (PCL) of 30 or higher (i.e., greater than the median in a prior sample of cardiac arrest survivors) or elevated PCL-5 scores of 30 or higher or Acute Stress Disorder Scale (ASDS) scores of 34 or higher
Owns either an iPhone or Android smartphone in order to run the app involved in the intervention

Exclusion Criteria

Breathing difficulty that does not allow participant to complete the intervention
Inability to comply with the protocol (either self-selected or indicated during screening that s/he could not complete all requested tasks). This includes, but is not limited to, patients with a level of cognitive impairment indicative of dementia and patients with current alcohol or substance abuse, and patients with severe mental illness (e.g., schizophrenia).

Study & Design

Study Type: INTERVENTIONAL

Study Design: SINGLE_GROUP

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
Intervention: Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback	Heart Rate Variability Biofeedback Training	Participants in this intervention group complete at-home heart rate variability biofeedback (HRVB) training using a chest-worn heart rate monitor and a smartphone app. They complete at least 10 minutes per day of HRVB training on at least 5 days per week for 3 weeks.

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Percentage of Eligible Cardiac Arrest (CA) Survivors Whom we Approach Who Ultimately Agree to Participate in the Pilot Study	Baseline/Visit 1	This is to assess the feasibility of enrollment in the trial. The denominator for this metric is the number of potential participants who were approached and contacted by the study team who were determined to be eligible for the study. The numerator is the number of participants who enrolled in the study (i.e., 10 participants).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
Percentage of Enrolled Participants Who Complete the Pilot Study	Pre-training/Visit 2, Post-training/Visit 3 (approximately 3 weeks apart)	This is to assess successful program adherence.
Percentage of Participants Who Report Adequate Appropriateness	Post-training/Visit 3 (approximately 3 weeks)	This is to assess the intervention's appropriateness for reducing anxiety, the proportion of participants who report scores \>= 4 would be adequate. This is to assess the intervention's appropriateness for reducing anxiety. The percentage of participants who report scores \>= 4 for the appropriateness-for-reducing-anxiety total score reflects the percentage of participants who indicated that the intervention is adequately appropriate for reducing anxiety.
Visit-2-to-3 Change in Cardiac-related Interoceptive Fear	Pre-training/Visit 2, Post-training/Visit 3 (approximately 3 weeks apart)	This is to assess the Visit-2-to-3 change in cardiac-related interoceptive fear measured as the within-person difference in the sum of the four cardiac-related items from the physical subscale of the Anxiety Sensitivity Index. The total score ranges from a minimum of 0 units on a scale to a maximum of 16 units on a scale. Lower scores indicate lower anxiety.
Visit-2-to-3 Change in Trait Negative Affect	Pre-training/Visit 2, Post-training/Visit 3 (approximately 3 weeks apart)	This is to assess the Visit-2-to-3 change in trait negative affect measured as the within-person difference in the total score of the negative subscale of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule. The total score ranges from a minimum of 10 units on a scale to a maximum of 50 units on a scale. Lower scores represent lower levels of Negative Affect.
Heart Rate Variability (HRV)	Up to 3 weeks (starting after Visit 2 and extending until Visit 3)	This is to assess HRV using participants' exported and deidentified data from the Elite HRV smartphone app. Specifically, HRV is operationalized as the natural log of the root mean square of the successive difference (lnRMSSD), a standard measure of beat-to-beat HRV. This HRV measure is recorded for each at-home training session completed by participants using the app and the heart rate monitor.
Percentage of Participants Who Report Adequate Feasibility	Post-training/Visit 3 (approximately 3 weeks)	This is to assess the intervention's feasibility. The percentage of participants who report scores \>= 4 for the feasibility total score reflects the percentage of participants who indicated that the intervention is adequately feasible.
Percentage of Participants Who Report Adequate Acceptability	Post-training/Visit 3 (approximately 3 weeks)	This is to assess the intervention's acceptability. The percentage of participants who report scores \>= 4 for the acceptability total score reflects the percentage of participants who indicated that the intervention is adequately acceptable.
Visit-2-to-3 Change in Trait Anxiety	Pre-training/Visit 2, Post-training/Visit 3 (approximately 3 weeks apart)	This is to assess the Visit-2-to-3 change in trait anxiety measured as the within-person difference in the total score of the trait version of the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory. The total score ranges from a minimum of 20 units on a scale to a maximum of 80 units on a scale. Higher scores indicate higher anxiety.
Percentage of Participants Who Complete a Majority of the At-home HRVB Sessions for the Pilot Study	Pre-training/Visit 2, Post-training/Visit 3 (approximately 3 weeks apart)	As a measure of intervention compliance, this is to assess the percentage of participants who complete a majority (\>= 8 of 15) of the at-home HRVB sessions.
Percentage of Participants Who Report Adequate Usability	Post-training/Visit 3 (approximately 3 weeks)	We will assess the percentage of participants who report total scores \>= 68 for their rating of the intervention's usability using the System Usability Scale.