跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2012/09/003011
CTRI/2012/09/003011已完成不适用

A randomised trial to compare Truview PCD, C-MAC and Macintosh laryngoscopes in paediatric airway management

Lady Hardinge Medical College and ASSOC HOSPITALS1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 150 人开始时间: 2012年1月3日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
150
试验地点
1
主要终点
Best laryngeal view obtained (POGO score)

研究概览

简要总结

Prediction of difficult airway is not always possible in a child as measurement of mentohyoid, thyromental, mandibular and inter-incisor lengths have no value. A plethora of airway devices have thus flooded the market to overcome the inadequacy of difficult airway prediction. The videolaryngoscopes have provided a better view of the glottis than the conventional laryngoscopes in adults, however there is limited knowledge of their performance in paediatric patients. We have therefore designed this study to evaluate and compare the Truview PCD and C-MAC laryngoscopes to the standard Macintosh laryngoscope in paediatric patients.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Computer generated randomization
盲法
Participant and Investigator Blinded

入排标准

年龄范围
1.00 Year(s) 至 6.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • 1-6 yrs either sex elective surgery requiring general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation.

排除标准

  • ASA physical grade 2, presence of raised intracranial pressure, high risk for pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents, coagulopathy presence of any pathology of head and neck.

结局指标

主要结局

Best laryngeal view obtained (POGO score)

时间窗: At the time of laryngoscopy

次要结局

  • Time taken to intubate(No. of attempts at intubation)

研究者

发起方
Lady Hardinge Medical College and ASSOC HOSPITALS
申办方类型
Government medical college

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Comparison of use of three different laryngoscopes... | 临床试验