A randomised trial to compare Truview PCD, C-MAC and Macintosh laryngoscopes in paediatric airway management
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 150
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Best laryngeal view obtained (POGO score)
研究概览
简要总结
Prediction of difficult airway is not always possible in a child as measurement of mentohyoid, thyromental, mandibular and inter-incisor lengths have no value. A plethora of airway devices have thus flooded the market to overcome the inadequacy of difficult airway prediction. The videolaryngoscopes have provided a better view of the glottis than the conventional laryngoscopes in adults, however there is limited knowledge of their performance in paediatric patients. We have therefore designed this study to evaluate and compare the Truview PCD and C-MAC laryngoscopes to the standard Macintosh laryngoscope in paediatric patients.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Computer generated randomization
- 盲法
- Participant and Investigator Blinded
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 1.00 Year(s) 至 6.00 Year(s)(—)
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •1-6 yrs either sex elective surgery requiring general anaesthesia with endotracheal intubation.
排除标准
- •ASA physical grade 2, presence of raised intracranial pressure, high risk for pulmonary aspiration of gastric contents, coagulopathy presence of any pathology of head and neck.
结局指标
主要结局
Best laryngeal view obtained (POGO score)
时间窗: At the time of laryngoscopy
次要结局
- Time taken to intubate(No. of attempts at intubation)
