Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/NCT01951521
NCT01951521UnknownNot Applicable

RandomizEd Controlled Trial for Pre-operAtive Dose-escaLation BOOST in Locally Advanced Rectal Cancer

UMC Utrecht2 sites in 1 country128 target enrollmentStarted: September 1, 2014Last updated:
Conditions
Interventions

Trial Snapshot

Phase
Not Applicable
Enrollment
128
Locations
2
Primary Endpoint
Complete response rate

Study Overview

Brief Summary

Randomized controlled trial in which the effect is investigated of a radiation boost in addition to standard chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer on complete response rate defined as pathological complete response, in those who undergo surgery, or 2-years local recurrence-free survival (2y-LRFS), in those who opted for a wait and see approach. Secondary objectives are adverse events due to chemoradiation (acute, perioperative and late toxicity), tumor response assessed with MRI, the impact of the boost on local and distant recurrence and survival as well as patient-reported quality of life and workability. The need for this comprehensive study is emphasized by the sub-optimal (radiation-) methods, heterogeneity between and poor reporting in the few previous trials in this field.

Detailed Description

Rationale: The current treatment for locally advanced rectal cancer consists of pre-operative chemoradiation treatment (CRT) (50 Gray (Gy) in 25 fractions) followed by surgical resection, according to T-/N-stage, circumferential resection margin (CRM) and tumor localization (see table 1). After this neo-adjuvant treatment approximately 15% of patients show pathological complete response (pCR), i.e.no residual tumor in the resected specimen on pathologic examination. Patients with pCR have a lower risk of local and distant recurrences and significantly longer disease-free and overall survival. Furthermore, in these patients surgery could possibly have been omitted. Selected patients with a clinical complete response (cCR), defined prior to surgery by rectoscopy, rectal examination and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), may opt for an organ-preserving therapy, a so called wait and see approach.

Response to chemoradiation occurs in a dose dependent fashion. Therefore, recent trials aimed to improve prognosis by radiation dose-escalation that resulted in improved pCR rates. Toxicity rates associated with radiation doses above 60 Gy are manageable and differ between studies; from increased to comparable or even lower toxicity. Moreover, dose escalation may increase the proportion of patients eligible for organ-preserving therapy.

Objective: We study whether addition of a radiation boost to standard chemoradiation in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer increases the complete response rate defined as pathological complete response, in those who undergo surgery, or 2-years local recurrence-free survival (2y-LRFS), in those who opted for a wait and see approach. Secondary objectives are adverse events due to chemoradiation (acute, perioperative and late toxicity), tumor response assessed with MRI, the impact of the boost on local and distant recurrence and survival as well as patient-reported quality of life and workability. The need for this comprehensive study is emphasized by the sub-optimal (radiation-) methods, heterogeneity between and poor reporting in the few previous trials in this field.

Study design: Multicentre Randomized Controlled Trial, nested within a prospective cohort according to the 'cohort multiple randomized controlled trial' (cmRCT) design.

Study population: Rectal cancer patients participating in a prospective cohort (the PLCRC project) and diagnosed with adenocarcinoma of the rectum whom will undergo chemoradiation based on clinical criteria (see table 1 section 1.2.1).

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention Model
Parallel
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
18 Years to — (Adult, Older Adult)
Sex
All
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No

Inclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Exclusion Criteria

  • Not provided

Arms & Interventions

Boost

Experimental

Boost radiation consists of 5 fractions of 3 Gy (total 15 Gy) delivered to the tumor (Gross Tumor Volume) additional to standard chemoradiation of 50 Gy with Capecitabine.

Intervention: Boost (Radiation)

Standard chemoradiation

No Intervention

Standard chemoradiation consisting of 25 x 2 Gy (total 50 Gy) with Capecitabine.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

Complete response rate

Time Frame: pathologic examination following surgery, at aproximately 13-15 weeks (control arm) or 14-16 weeks (boost arm) after randomization or clinical complete respons of 2 years after first response assessment.

The primary endpoint is complete response either defined as pathological complete response (pCR) in patients who undergo surgery, assessed by standardized pathologic examination of the surgical specimen, or 2-years local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) after chemoradiation in patients who opted for a wait and see approach.

Secondary Outcomes

  • Patient reported quality of life(at baseline and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment.)
  • Tumor response on Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)(at week 2 during chemoradiation and week 7 post chemoradiation.)
  • Acute toxicity in common toxicity criteria for adverse events (CTCAE).(Until surgery at 8-10 weeks post chemoradiation (which is 13-15 weeks (control) or 14-16 weeks (boost) post randomization)
  • (disease-free) survival(up to death of included patients, for a maximum of 60 years post-randomization.)
  • Surgical complication(untill 30 days after surgery, which is 17-19 weeks (control) or 18-20 weeks (boost) post randomization)
  • Patient reported workability(at baseline and 3, 6, 12 and 24 months after treatment.)

Investigators

Sponsor Class
Other
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Helena M Verkooijen

Principle Investigator

UMC Utrecht

Study Sites (2)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials

Completed
Not Applicable
Clinical Trial of The Use of Bolus in Post Mastectomy Irradiation in Breast CancerBreast CancerRadiodermatitis
NCT01925651AC Camargo Cancer Center58
Active, not recruiting
Not Applicable
Radiation Therapy Boost Before Surgery for the Treatment of Non-metastatic Breast CancerAnatomic Stage 0 Breast Cancer AJCC v8Anatomic Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v8Anatomic Stage IA Breast Cancer AJCC v8Anatomic Stage IB Breast Cancer AJCC v8Anatomic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8Anatomic Stage IIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8Anatomic Stage IIB Breast Cancer AJCC v8Invasive Breast CarcinomaNon-Metastatic Breast CarcinomaPrognostic Stage 0 Breast Cancer AJCC v8Prognostic Stage I Breast Cancer AJCC v8Prognostic Stage IA Breast Cancer AJCC v8Prognostic Stage IB Breast Cancer AJCC v8Prognostic Stage II Breast Cancer AJCC v8Prognostic Stage IIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8Prognostic Stage IIB Breast Cancer AJCC v8Prognostic Stage III Breast Cancer AJCC v8Prognostic Stage IIIA Breast Cancer AJCC v8Prognostic Stage IIIB Breast Cancer AJCC v8Prognostic Stage IIIC Breast Cancer AJCC v8
NCT04871516Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey103
Not yet recruiting
Phase 1
Study Examining the Safety and Toxicity of Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) Followed by PCX12 Immunotherapy Delivered by Intratumoral Injection for the Treatment of Patients With Locally Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma (LAPC)Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma
NCT06217666Haoming (Carl) Qiu24
Terminated
Phase 1
Radiation Therapy, Cisplatin, and Etoposide in Treating Patients With Non-small Cell Lung Cancer That Cannot Be Removed by SurgeryRecurrent Non-small Cell Lung CancerStage IIB Non-small Cell Lung CancerStage IIIA Non-small Cell Lung CancerStage IIIB Non-small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT01411098University of Washington6
Terminated
Phase 3
Pre- Versus Post-operative SRS for Resectable Brain MetastasesBrain Metastases
NCT04474925AHS Cancer Control Alberta8
RECTAL BOOST Study | Clinical Trial