Digital Training Interventions for Low Back Pain
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Interventions
- Behavioral: Supervised digital training with focus on core stabilityBehavioral: Supervised digital training with focus on aerobic exerciseBehavioral: Non-supervised daily physical activity
- Registration Number
- NCT05679167
- Lead Sponsor
- Vastra Gotaland Region
- Brief Summary
The patients will be clinically examined, as well as evaluated with Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) and Magnet Resonance Imaging (MRI) at baseline and at follow-ups.
- Detailed Description
The overall aim is to evaluate two different types of digital training interventions supervised by physiotherapists compared to daily physical activity in terms of clinical, imaging-based and patient-reported outcome in patients with low back pain. Furthermore, to evaluate whether new diagnostic MRI methods can identify longitudinal spine tissue changes and to analyse if there is an exercise-related difference.
Patients seeking primary health care for lower back pain will be randomized to three groups. The patients will be clinically examined, assessed with Magnet Resonance Imaging (MRI) and Patient Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs) will be evaluated at baseline and at follow-ups.
A detailed description of the study protocol, see attached document.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 90
- Low back pain> 3 months
- Age 18-50 years
- Access to computer/tablet/mobile phone
- Inadequate Swedish as the language is an obstacle to be able to fully understand written and oral information regarding the project and to follow training instructions
- Other ongoing treatment/exercise for their low back pain
- Patients with radiating leg pain and neurological symptoms where herniated discs are suspected
- Previous back/neck surgery
- Pregnancy
- Diagnosed systematic diseases engaging the spine as rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis
- Factors that prevent an MRI examination, such as claustrophobia, metal implants, etc.
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Non-supervised daily physical activity Supervised digital training with focus on aerobic exercise The patients will be identified at the primary health center and after fulfilling the inclusion criteria and all baseline examination are completed the patients will be randomized. In group 3 will start a daily physical activity program, with regular support from a physiotherapist. Supervised digital training: core stability Supervised digital training with focus on aerobic exercise The patients will be identified at the primary health center and after fulfilling the inclusion criteria and all baseline examination are completed the patients will be randomized. In group 1 the patients will attend supervised digital training with focus on core stability Supervised digital training: aerobic exercise Supervised digital training with focus on core stability The patients will be identified at the primary health center and after fulfilling the inclusion criteria and all baseline examination are completed the patients will be randomized. In group 2 the patients will attend supervised digital training with focus on aerobic exercise Supervised digital training: aerobic exercise Non-supervised daily physical activity The patients will be identified at the primary health center and after fulfilling the inclusion criteria and all baseline examination are completed the patients will be randomized. In group 2 the patients will attend supervised digital training with focus on aerobic exercise Supervised digital training: core stability Non-supervised daily physical activity The patients will be identified at the primary health center and after fulfilling the inclusion criteria and all baseline examination are completed the patients will be randomized. In group 1 the patients will attend supervised digital training with focus on core stability Non-supervised daily physical activity Supervised digital training with focus on core stability The patients will be identified at the primary health center and after fulfilling the inclusion criteria and all baseline examination are completed the patients will be randomized. In group 3 will start a daily physical activity program, with regular support from a physiotherapist.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Difference in T2 (transverse relaxation time) 12 months compared to baseline and 6 months MRI can characterize tissue by two different relaxation times, T1 and T2
Change in Patient-reported pain 12 months compared to baseline and 6 months Visual Analog Scale (VAS) registration 0 (=no pain)-100 (=worst pain), where In the minimal clinically significant change has been estimated as 11 points on a 100-point scale
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Change in Functional tests (Åstrand ergometer test) 12 months compared to baseline and 6 months Åstrand ergometer test (estimated VO2-max)
Change in PROM (Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES)) 12 months compared to baseline and 6 months Generalized Self-Efficacy Scale (GSES), a 10 item self-report measure of self-efficacy, with a higher score indicating more self-efficacy.
Change in Clinical outcomes (Walking on heels) 12 months compared to baseline and 6 months Ability to walk on heels (yes/no)
Change in Functional tests (Prone-bridge test) 12 months compared to baseline and 6 months Prone-bridge test (total sec)
Change in Clinical outcomes (Muscle hypotrophy) 12 months compared to baseline and 6 months Muscle hypotrophy (yes/no)
Change in PROM (Oswestry Low Back Disability Index) 12 months compared to baseline and 6 months Oswestry Low Back Disability Index (0-4 No disability, 5-14 Mild disability, 15-24, Moderate disability, 25-34 Severe disability).
Change in clinical outcomes (Standing inspection) 6 months compared to baseline Normal spine curvature (yes/no)
Change in clinical outcomes (Standing side-to-side symmetry) 6 months compared to baseline Standing side-to-side symmetry (yes/no)
Change in Clinical outcomes (Walking on toes) 12 months compared to baseline and 6 months Ability to walk on toes (yes/no)
Change in Functional tests (Sit-to-stand test) 12 months compared to baseline and 6 months Sit-to-stand test (number of rises during 30 sec)
Change in PROM (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD)) 12 months compared to baseline and 6 months Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HAD) 0-7 = Normal, 8-10 = Borderline abnormal, 11-21 = Abnormal).
Change in Clinical outcomes (Standing inspection) 12 months compared to baseline and 6 months Normal spine curvature (yes/no)
Change in Clinical outcomes (Standing side-to-side symmetry) 12 months compared to baseline and 6 months Standing side-to-side symmetry (yes/no)
Change in PROM (Standardized National standardized questions on physical activity) 12 months compared to baseline and 6 months Standardized National standardized questions on physical activity (grading activity in minutes/week).
Change in PROM (The 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L)) 12 months compared to baseline and 6 months The 5-level EQ-5D version (EQ-5D-5L) according to EuroQol Group The descriptive system comprises five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression.
Change in PROM (Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK)) 12 months compared to baseline and 6 months Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK) is 17 items a self-reporting questionnaire based on evaluation of fear of movement, fear of physical activity, and fear avoidance. The total score of the scale range from 17- 68, where 17 means no kinesiophobia, 68 means severe kinesiophobia, and score ± 37 indicates there is kinesiophobia.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Ninni Sernert
🇸🇪Vänersborg, Sweden