General Exercises With and Without TA Contraction in Patients With Nonspecific Acute LBP
- Conditions
- Low Back Pain
- Interventions
- Other: General exercises with tranversus abdmoinis contractionOther: General exercises
- Registration Number
- NCT05838040
- Lead Sponsor
- Ahram Canadian University
- Brief Summary
PURPOSE: To evaluate the effectiveness of adding transversus abdominis contraction to general exercises to treat patients with nonspecific acute low back pain.
BACKGROUND: Non-specific low back pain affects people of all ages and is a leading contributor to disease burden worldwide. Management consists of education and reassurance, analgesic medicines, non-pharmacological therapies, and timely review. The clinical course of low back pain is often favourable; thus, many patients require little if any formal medical care. Two treatment strategies are currently used, a stepped approach beginning with more simple care that is progressed if the patient does not respond, and the use of simple risk prediction methods to individualise the amount and type of care provided. Motor control exercises, which advocate the contraction of the TrA have shown some efficacy for patients with chronic low back pain. However, the validity of this strategy for patients with acute LBP is unclear.
HYPOTHESES: there will be no significant effect of adding transversus abdominis contraction to general exercise than general exercise alone in patients with non-specific acute low back pain.
RESEARCH QUESTION: Is there a statistically significant effect of adding transversus abdominis contraction to general exercise on outcomes of patients with non-specific acute low back pain?
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 60
- Individuals of both sexes
- Aged between 18 and 50 years
- Acute nonspecific low back pain according to The most recent guidelines for the diagnosis and management of NSLBP come from the American College of Physicians and were published in 2017. According to these guidelines, the diagnosis of acute NSLBP should be made based on the following criteria:
Acute onset of low back pain, defined as pain lasting for less than 12 weeks No specific identifiable cause of the pain (e.g., infection, malignancy, fracture, inflammatory disorder) No radicular symptoms (e.g., pain radiating down the leg) No significant neurological deficits or findings on physical examination (e.g., loss of reflexes or muscle strength)
- Serious low back pathology
- Contraindications to exercise therapy
- Neurological signs (leg weakness)
- Specific spinal pathology (e.g., malignancy, or inflammatory joint or bone disease)
- Prior back surgery
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- CROSSOVER
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description General exercises with TA contraction General exercises with tranversus abdmoinis contraction This exercise activates paravertebral and abdominal muscles. Because this exercise impose extra loading on the spinal tissues, the general exercise was selected on the basis of maximizing the contraction benefit/spinal loading ratio. The patients will be asked to contract TA will doing these exercises. General Exercises General exercises This exercise activates paravertebral and abdominal muscles. Because this exercise impose extra loading on the spinal tissues, the general exercise was selected on the basis of maximizing the contraction benefit/spinal loading ratio.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Pain intensity via numeric pain rating scale Changes in pain intensity at baseline, 10 weeks after randomization, 3 and 6 months after discharge. The primary outcome measure is pain intensity, which will be assessed using a numeric pain rating scale. Participants will be asked to rate their pain intensity on a scale of 0 to 10, with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating the worst possible pain. Pain intensity will be measured at four time points: baseline, 10 weeks after randomization, 3 months after discharge, and 6 months after discharge. The change in pain intensity from baseline to each follow-up time point will be analyzed using appropriate statistical methods. The primary objective of the study is to determine whether the Back to Fitness Program is effective in reducing pain intensity over time.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Global Perception Effect changes in Global perception at baseline, 10 weeks after randomization, 3 months after discharge, and 6 months after discharge. Global perception effect is a measure of the participant's overall perception of the effectiveness of the general exercise in reducing pain and improving function. It will be assessed using a single-item question that asks participants to rate their perception of the program's effectiveness on a scale of 0 to 10. Higher scores indicate greater effectiveness.
Pain Pressure Threshold Changes at Pain pressure threshold at baseline, 10 weeks after randomization, 3 and 6 months after discharge. Pain pressure threshold is a measure of the minimum amount of pressure that causes pain in the affected area. It will be assessed using a pressure algometer.
Disability Changes in Disability at baseline, 10 weeks after randomization, 3 months after discharge, and 6 months after discharge. Disability will be assessed using the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire, which is a self-reported questionnaire that assesses the impact of back pain on daily activities. The questionnaire includes 24 items that ask participants to rate their ability to perform various activities on a scale of 0 to 24. Higher scores indicate greater disability.
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Outpatient clinic of faculty of physical therapy, Ahram Canadian University
🇪🇬Al Ḩayy Ath Thāmin, Giza, Egypt