A Study of JNJ-95475939 in the Treatment of Participants With Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis (AD)
- Conditions
- Dermatitis, Atopic
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT06881251
- Lead Sponsor
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC
- Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate how well JNJ-95475939 works as compared to placebo in participants with moderate to severe atopic dermatitis.
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- RECRUITING
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 240
Not provided
Not provided
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Group A: Dupilumab Dupilumab Participants will receive Dupilumab dose regimen 1 subcutaneously through Week 22. Group B: JNJ-95475939 JNJ-95475939 Participants will receive JNJ-95475939 dose regimen 1 subcutaneously through Week 22. Group C: JNJ-95475939 JNJ-95475939 Participants will receive JNJ-95475939 dose regimen 2 subcutaneously through Week 22. Group D: JNJ-95475939 JNJ-95475939 Participants will receive JNJ-95475939 dose regimen 3 subcutaneously through Week 22. Group E: Placebo JNJ-95475939 Participants will receive matching placebo subcutaneously through Week 10, then switch to receive JNJ-95475939 dose regimen 1 subcutaneously between Week 12 and Week 22. Group E: Placebo Placebo Participants will receive matching placebo subcutaneously through Week 10, then switch to receive JNJ-95475939 dose regimen 1 subcutaneously between Week 12 and Week 22.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of Participants with Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) 75 Response at Week 12 Baseline, Week 12 EASI-75 response is defined as at least 75 percent (%) improvement in EASI total score. EASI-75 response is defined as at least 75% improvement from baseline in EASI total score. The EASI score is used to measure the severity and extent of atopic dermatitis (AD) and measures erythema, infiltration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head/neck, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting a higher severity of AD.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percent Change from Baseline in the Score of Item 2 of the AD Sleep Scale at Week 24 Baseline, Week 24 The AD sleep scale is a validated 3-item PRO instrument to capture self-reported impact of itch on sleep disturbance each day, including difficulty falling asleep, number of night-time awakenings, and difficulty falling back asleep after waking during the previous night. Each AD Sleep Scale item is scored individually. For Item 2, participants select the number of times they woke up each night, ranging from 0 to 29 times.
Percentage of Participants With EASI-90 Response at Week 12 Baseline, Week 12 EASI-90 response is defined as at least 90% improvement in EASI total score. EASI-90 response is defined as at least 90% improvement from baseline in EASI total score. The EASI score is used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, infiltration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head/neck, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting a higher severity of AD.
Percentage of Participants With EASI-100 Response at Week 12 Baseline, Week 12 EASI-100 response is defined as at least 100% improvement in EASI total score. EASI-100 response is defined as at least 100% improvement from baseline in EASI total score. The EASI score is used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, infiltration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head/neck, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting a higher severity of AD.
Percentage of Participants Achieving a >= 4-Point Reduction in PP-NRS Score From Baseline Through Week 12 From Baseline through Week 12 The PP-NRS is a single item asking participants to assess their worst itch over the past 24 hours. The response categories range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). Higher scores indicating greater severity.
Percentage of Participants with EASI-75 Response at Week 16 Baseline, Week 16 EASI-75 response is defined as at least 75% improvement in EASI total score. EASI-75 response is defined as at least 75% improvement from baseline in EASI total score. The EASI score is used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, infiltration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head/neck, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting a higher severity of AD.
Percentage of Participants with EASI-90 Response at Week 16 Baseline, Week 16 EASI-90 response is defined as at least 90% improvement in EASI total score. EASI-90 response is defined as at least 90% improvement from baseline in EASI total score. The EASI score is used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, infiltration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head/neck, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting a higher severity of AD.
Percentage of Participants with EASI-100 Response at Week 16 Week 16 EASI-100 response is defined as at least 100% improvement in EASI total score. EASI-100 response is defined as at least 100% improvement from baseline in EASI total score. The EASI score was used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, infiltration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head/neck, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting a higher severity of AD.
Percentage of Participants Achieving vIGA-AD Score of 0 or 1 and a Reduction From Baseline of >= 2 Points at Week 16 Baseline, Week 16 vIGA-AD is an assessment instrument used in clinical studies to rate the severity of AD, based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0, where 0=Clear: No inflammatory signs of AD; 1=almost clear: Barely perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification; 2=mild: Slight but definite erythema, induration/papulation and/or minimal lichenification. No oozing or crusting; 3=moderate: Clearly perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification, oozing or crusting may be present and 4=severe: Marked erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification; Oozing or crusting may be present. Higher scores are indicative of a more severe AD.
Percentage of Participants Achieving a >= 4-Point Reduction in PP-NRS Score From Baseline Through Week 24 From Baseline Through Week 24 The PP-NRS is a single item asking participants to assess their worst itch over the past 24 hours. The response categories range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). Higher scores indicating greater severity.
Percentage of Participants with EASI-75 Response at Week 24 Baseline, Week 24 EASI-75 response is defined as at least 75% improvement in EASI total score. EASI-75 response is defined as at least 75% improvement from baseline in EASI total score. The EASI score is used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, infiltration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head/neck, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting a higher severity of AD.
Percentage of Participants with EASI-90 Response at Week 24 Week 24 EASI-90 response is defined as at least 90% improvement in EASI total score. EASI-90 response is defined as at least 90% improvement from baseline in EASI total score. The EASI score is used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, infiltration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head/neck, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting a higher severity of AD.
Percentage of Participants with EASI-100 Response at Week 24 Week 24 EASI-100 response is defined as at least 100% improvement in EASI total score. EASI-100 response is defined as at least 100% improvement from baseline in EASI total score. The EASI score is used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, infiltration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head/neck, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting a higher severity of AD.
Percent Change from Baseline in the EASI Total Score at Week 24 Baseline, Week 24 The EASI is a validated measure used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the severity and extent of AD. The EASI score is used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, infiltration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head/neck, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting a higher severity of AD.
Percentage of Participants Achieving a >= 4-Point Reduction in Skin Pain NRS Score From Baseline to Week 24 Baseline, Week 24 The Skin Pain NRS is a single item asking participants to assess their worst skin pain over the past 24 hours. The response categories range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). Higher scores indicating greater severity.
Percent Change From Baseline in PP-NRS Score at Week 24 Baseline, Week 24 The PP-NRS is a single item asking participants to assess their worst itch over the past 24 hours. The response categories range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). Higher scores indicating greater severity.
Percent Change from Baseline in Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 24 Baseline, Week 24 The Skin Pain NRS is a single item asking participants to assess their worst skin pain over the past 24 hours. The response categories range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). Higher scores indicating greater severity.
Percentage of Participants Achieving Validated Investigator Global Assessment for Atopic Dermatitis (vIGA-AD) Score of 0 or 1 and a Reduction From Baseline of Greater Than Equal to (>=) 2 Points at Week 12 Baseline, Week 12 vIGA-AD is an assessment instrument used in clinical studies to rate the severity of AD, based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0, where 0=Clear: No inflammatory signs of AD; 1=almost clear: Barely perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification; 2=mild: Slight but definite erythema, induration/papulation and/or minimal lichenification. No oozing or crusting; 3=moderate: Clearly perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification, oozing or crusting may be present and 4=severe: Marked erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification; Oozing or crusting may be present. Higher scores are indicative of a more severe AD.
Percentage of Participants Achieving vIGA-AD Score of 0 and a Reduction From Baseline of >= 2 Points at Week 12 Baseline, Week 12 vIGA-AD is an assessment instrument used in clinical studies to rate the severity of AD, based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0, where 0=Clear: No inflammatory signs of AD; 1=almost clear: Barely perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification; 2=mild: Slight but definite erythema, induration/papulation and/or minimal lichenification. No oozing or crusting; 3=moderate: Clearly perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification, oozing or crusting may be present and 4=severe: Marked erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification; Oozing or crusting may be present. Higher scores are indicative of a more severe AD.
Percent Change From Baseline in the EASI Total Score at Week 12 Baseline, Week 12 The EASI is a validated measure used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the severity and extent of AD. The EASI score is used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, infiltration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head/neck, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting a higher severity of AD.
Percentage of Participants Achieving a >= 4-Point Reduction in Skin Pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 12 Baseline, Week 12 The Skin Pain NRS is a single item asking participants to assess their worst skin pain over the past 24 hours. The response categories range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). Higher scores indicating greater severity.
Percent Change from Baseline in Peak Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale (PP-NRS) Score at Week 12 Baseline, Week 12 The PP-NRS is a single item asking participants to assess their worst itch over the past 24 hours. The response categories range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). Higher scores indicating greater severity.
Percent Change from Baseline in Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 12 Baseline, Week 12 The Skin Pain NRS is a single item asking participants to assess their worst skin pain over the past 24 hours. The response categories range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). Higher scores indicating greater severity.
Percent Change from Baseline in the Score of Item 2 of the AD Sleep Scale at Week 12 Baseline, Week 12 The AD sleep scale is a validated 3-item PRO instrument to capture self-reported impact of itch on sleep disturbance each day, including difficulty falling asleep, number of night-time awakenings, and difficulty falling back asleep after waking during the previous night. Each AD Sleep Scale item is scored individually. For Item 2, participants select the number of times they woke up each night, ranging from 0 to 29 times.
Percentage of Participants Achieving vIGA-AD Score of 0 and a Reduction From Baseline of >= 2 Points at Week 16 Baseline, Week 16 vIGA-AD is an assessment instrument used in clinical studies to rate the severity of AD, based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0, where 0=Clear: No inflammatory signs of AD; 1=almost clear: Barely perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification; 2=mild: Slight but definite erythema, induration/papulation and/or minimal lichenification. No oozing or crusting; 3=moderate: Clearly perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification, oozing or crusting may be present and 4=severe: Marked erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification; Oozing or crusting may be present. Higher scores are indicative of a more severe AD.
Percent Change from Baseline in the EASI Total Score at Week 16 Baseline, Week 16 The EASI is a validated measure used in clinical practice and clinical trials to assess the severity and extent of AD. The EASI score is used to measure the severity and extent of AD and measures erythema, infiltration/papulation, excoriation and lichenification on 4 anatomic regions of the body: head/neck, trunk, upper and lower extremities. The total EASI score ranges from 0 (minimum) to 72 (maximum) points, with the higher scores reflecting a higher severity of AD.
Percentage of Participants Achieving a >= 4-Point Reduction in Skin Pain Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) Score From Baseline to Week 16 Baseline, Week 16 The Skin Pain NRS is a single item asking participants to assess their worst skin pain over the past 24 hours. The response categories range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). Higher scores indicating greater severity.
Percent Change from Baseline in PP-NRS Score at Week 16 Baseline, Week 16 The PP-NRS is a single item asking participants to assess their worst itch over the past 24 hours. The response categories range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). Higher scores indicating greater severity.
Percent Change from Baseline in Skin Pain NRS Score at Week 16 Baseline, Week 16 The Skin Pain NRS is a single item asking participants to assess their worst skin pain over the past 24 hours. The response categories range from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain). Higher scores indicating greater severity.
Percent Change from Baseline in the Score of Item 2 of the AD Sleep Scale at Week 16 Baseline, Week 16 The AD sleep scale is a validated 3-item PRO instrument to capture self-reported impact of itch on sleep disturbance each day, including difficulty falling asleep, number of night-time awakenings, and difficulty falling back asleep after waking during the previous night. Each AD Sleep Scale item is scored individually. For Item 2, participants select the number of times they woke up each night, ranging from 0 to 29 times.
Percentage of Participants Achieving vIGA-AD Score of 0 or 1 and a Reduction From Baseline of >= 2 Points at Week 24 Baseline, Week 24 vIGA-AD is an assessment instrument used in clinical studies to rate the severity of AD, based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0, where 0=Clear: No inflammatory signs of AD; 1=almost clear: Barely perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification; 2=mild: Slight but definite erythema, induration/papulation and/or minimal lichenification. No oozing or crusting; 3=moderate: Clearly perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification, oozing or crusting may be present and 4=severe: Marked erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification; Oozing or crusting may be present. Higher scores are indicative of a more severe AD.
Percentage of Participants Achieving vIGA-AD Score of 0 and a Reduction From Baseline of >= 2 Points at Week 24 Baseline, Week 24 vIGA-AD is an assessment instrument used in clinical studies to rate the severity of AD, based on a 5-point scale ranging from 0, where 0=Clear: No inflammatory signs of AD; 1=almost clear: Barely perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification; 2=mild: Slight but definite erythema, induration/papulation and/or minimal lichenification. No oozing or crusting; 3=moderate: Clearly perceptible erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification, oozing or crusting may be present and 4=severe: Marked erythema, induration/papulation and/or lichenification; Oozing or crusting may be present. Higher scores are indicative of a more severe AD.
Number of Participants with Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) From Baseline up to Week 32 Participants with AEs and SAEs will be reported. An AE can be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal (investigational or non investigational) product, whether or not related to that medicinal (investigational or non investigational) product. TEAEs are AEs with onset during the intervention phase or that are a consequence of a preexisting condition that has worsened since baseline. A SAE is an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability or incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Related Research Topics
Explore scientific publications, clinical data analysis, treatment approaches, and expert-compiled information related to the mechanisms and outcomes of this trial. Click any topic for comprehensive research insights.
Trial Locations
- Locations (49)
First OC Dermatology
🇺🇸Fountain Valley, California, United States
Hamilton Research LLC
🇺🇸Alpharetta, Georgia, United States
Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group LLC
🇺🇸Indianapolis, Indiana, United States
Indiana Clinical Trial Center
🇺🇸Plainfield, Indiana, United States
Optima Research
🇺🇸Boardman, Ohio, United States
Oregon Medical Research Center
🇺🇸Portland, Oregon, United States
Shirasaki Dermatology Clinic
🇯🇵Takaoka shi, Japan
Arlington Center for Dermatology
🇺🇸Arlington, Texas, United States
Center for Clinical Studies
🇺🇸Houston, Texas, United States
Progressive Clinical Research
🇺🇸San Antonio, Texas, United States
Frontier Derm Partners CRO, LLC
🇺🇸Mill Creek, Washington, United States
Instituto de Neumonologia y Dermatologia
🇦🇷Buenos Aires, Argentina
Derma Internacional S A
🇦🇷Buenos Aires, Argentina
CIPREC
🇦🇷Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Argentina
Dermatology Research Institute Inc
🇨🇦Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Dr. Chih ho Hong Medical
🇨🇦Surrey, British Columbia, Canada
Lynderm Research Inc.
🇨🇦Markham, Ontario, Canada
Innovaderm Research Inc.
🇨🇦Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Centre De Recherche Dermatologique Du Quebec Metropolitain
🇨🇦Quebec, Canada
Fachklinik Bad Bentheim
🇩🇪Bad Bentheim, Germany
ISA - Interdisciplinary Study Association GmbH
🇩🇪Berlin, Germany
Eurofins bioskin GmbH
🇩🇪Hamburg, Germany
Studienzentrum Dr Schwarz Germany
🇩🇪Langenau, Germany
Fukuoka University Hospital
🇯🇵Fukuoka-shi, Japan
Osaka Habikino Medical Center
🇯🇵Habikino, Japan
Teikyo University Hospital
🇯🇵Itabashi Ku, Japan
Kume Clinic
🇯🇵Sakai City, Japan
Sapporo Skin Clinic
🇯🇵Sapporo shi, Japan
Jitaikai Tachikawa dermatology clinic
🇯🇵Tachikawa, Japan
Mie University Hospital
🇯🇵Tsu, Japan
Centrum Medyczne All Med
🇵🇱Krakow, Poland
Centrum Terapii Wspolczesnej J M Jasnorzewska Spolka Komandytowo Akcyjna
🇵🇱Lodz, Poland
Queens Square Medical Facilities
🇯🇵Yokohama, Japan
Nomura Dermatology Clinic
🇯🇵Yokohama, Japan
Centrum Badan Klinicznych PI House sp z o o
🇵🇱Gdansk, Poland
Care Clinic
🇵🇱Katowice, Poland
Specjalistyczny gabinet dermatologiczny Aplikacyjno Badawczy Marek Brzewski Pawel Brzewski Spolka Cywilna
🇵🇱Krakow, Poland
Klinika Ambroziak Dermatologia
🇵🇱Warszawa, Poland
WroMedica I Bielicka A Strzalkowska s c
🇵🇱Wroclaw, Poland
Hosp. Gral. Univ. Dr. Balmis
🇪🇸Alicante, Spain
Hosp. Univ. San Cecilio
🇪🇸Granada, Spain
Grupo Dermatologico Y Estetico Pedro Jaen
🇪🇸Madrid, Spain
Hosp. Univ. de La Princesa
🇪🇸Madrid, Spain
Hosp. de Manises
🇪🇸Manises, Spain
Hosp. Clinico Univ. de Santiago
🇪🇸Santiago de Compostela, Spain
Northwick Park Hospital
🇬🇧London, United Kingdom
Guys and St Thomas NHS Foundation Trust
🇬🇧London, United Kingdom
The Queen Elizabeth Hospital King's Lynn NHS Foundation Trust
🇬🇧Norfolk, United Kingdom
Salford Royal Hospital
🇬🇧Salford, United Kingdom