Efficacy and Safety of Two Pharmacologic Strategies on Neurocognitive Impairment in HIV Infection. The TRIANT-TE Study
- Conditions
- Neurocognitive DisturbanceHIV Infection
- Interventions
- Registration Number
- NCT01348282
- Lead Sponsor
- Fundación FLS de Lucha Contra el Sida, las Enfermedades Infecciosas y la Promoción de la Salud y la Ciencia
- Brief Summary
The current project proposes the comparison of two pharmacologic strategies as adjunctive treatments for the improvement of HIV-associated neurocognitive disruption, additionally to use of HAART. The investigators propose the use of the compound that has shown greatest benefits in this context to date, the lithium, versus the use of a well-tolerated and promising drug in other pathologies with neurocognitive affectation, such as Alzheimer or Parkinson diseases, which is the rivastigmine. In those other diseases, this second compound has recently offered a good tolerability, but also benefits on attention, memory and other neurocognitive areas. Both study groups, patients on therapy with lithium and patients on therapy with rivastigmine, will be compared to a control group, which will not initiate any other treatment (therefore only continuing antiretroviral therapy). The investigators are aware that this proposal will offer new relevant data for the study of neurocognitive improvement in HIV infection, as well will allow a better knowledge of clinical management of HIV-infected patients with CNS disease, an aspect that is a common clinical concern today.
- Detailed Description
Adjunctive treatments based on neurocognitive improvement for HIV-infected patients with CNS disruption have consisted essentially of neurostimulant or neuroprotective treatments. Reports published to date have involved valproic acid, peptide T, CPI-1189, selegiline, memantine, minocycline and lithium. Regarding valproic acid, two trials have confirmed lack of benefit using this compound on HIV-associated neurocognitive decline. In case of peptide T, CPI-1189, selegiline, memantine and minocycline, although their potential mechanisms on brain follow different pathways, trend towards improvement on neurocognitive functioning has been observed. Nonetheless, results on those trials are particularly based on a short term and, moreover, mild connections with benefits on neurocognitive and functional measures have been established. The lithium has been the compound showing clearest benefits on this regard. Two reports have consistently demonstrated benefits on neurocognitive performance using this neuroprotective agent, both in patients with HIV and showing impairment previously. However, lithium is well known to be a drug not easily incorporated in routine practice, at least further than in a psychiatry context. In addition, adverse events related to their use are relatively frequent, and therefore clinical follow-up must be especially controlled. Besides, lithium concentrations are also a concerning aspect considering its use, and drug plasma levels are recommended to be performed throughout the therapy application.
For all these reasons, the current project proposes the comparison of two pharmacologic strategies as adjunctive treatments for the improvement of HIV-associated neurocognitive disruption, additionally to use of HAART. The investigators propose the use of the compound that has shown greatest benefits in this context to date, the lithium, versus the use of a well-tolerated and promising drug in other pathologies with neurocognitive affectation, such as Alzheimer or Parkinson diseases, which is the rivastigmine. In those other diseases, this second compound has recently offered a good tolerability, but also benefits on attention, memory and other neurocognitive areas. Furthermore, in the case of this project, rivastigmine is suggested to be used through a transdermal system patch, a fact that can provide suitability and comfortability with regard to the selected administration method. Both study groups, patients on therapy with lithium and patients on therapy with rivastigmine, will be compared to a control group, which will not initiate any other treatment (therefore only continuing antiretroviral therapy). The investigators are aware that this proposal will offer new relevant data for the study of neurocognitive improvement in HIV infection, as well will allow a better knowledge of clinical management of HIV-infected patients with CNS disease, an aspect that is a common clinical concern today.
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- COMPLETED
- Sex
- All
- Target Recruitment
- 33
- Age ranged from 20 to 75 years old
- Correct understanding of study objectives
- Written consent signed
- HIV infection confirmed by Western Blot or two ELISA tests
- Existence of an HIV-associated neurocognitive disorder according to the diagnosis classification offered by Antinori and cols (Neurology, 2007)
- Being on antiretroviral treatment.
- Spanish/Catalan speaker.
- To be on a treatment that may interact pharmacologically with any of the new drugs used in study arms.
- Breastfeeding, pregnancy or fertile women willing to be pregnant.
- Renal failure or severe cardiovascular disease.
- Weakness, dehydration or severe sodium depletion.
- Sick sinus syndrome or cardiac conduction disturbances (sinoatrial block or atrioventricular block).
- Active duodenal or gastric ulcer.
- Urinary obstruction.
- Epilepsy.
- Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).
Study & Design
- Study Type
- INTERVENTIONAL
- Study Design
- PARALLEL
- Arm && Interventions
Group Intervention Description Lithium Lithium Lithium group: Patients who will initiate therapy with lithium, in tablets, beginning a 2-daily 400 mg dose, and changing further adjusting the dose according to drug levels in serum. Rivastigmine Rivastigmine rivastigmine, in transdermal patch administration, beginning a once-daily 4.6 mg dose, and changing further increasing the dose up to once-daily 9.5 mg.
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Percentage of persons with neurocognitive impairment in the different study groups From screening to month 12 The main variable to consider is the existence of HIV-associated neurocognitive impairment. Therefore, the percentage of persons with neurocognitive impairment in different study groups will be the main variable that will report on the improvement associated with new treatments.
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method Adverse events associated with the initiation of therapy and toxicity parameters Week 2, month 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 Emotional variables Baseline, month 3, 6, 12. Depression and anxiety symptoms will be assessed by HADS questionnaire.
Functional variables Baseline, month 3, 6, 12. A total of six scales assessing functional interference regarding activities of daily living, as well as self-reported neurocognitive functioning, will be measured.
Quality of life variables Baseline, month 3, 6, 12. Four dimensions concerning quality of life, evaluated by MOS-HIV questionnaire, and satisfaction scales, based on treatments and clinical status, will be evaluated.
Demographics Baseline
Trial Locations
- Locations (1)
Fundació LLuita contra la SIDA
🇪🇸Badalona, Barcelona, Spain