Skip to main content
Clinical Trials/CTRI/2025/08/093857
CTRI/2025/08/093857
Not yet recruiting
Not Applicable

The Effect of Cervical Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation along with Pressure Biofeedback on improving Severity, Range of Motion and Quality of Life in patients with Chronic Cervical Dystonia A Pre Post Interventional study

Dr Tanisha Mali1 site in 1 country25 target enrollmentStarted: October 14, 2025Last updated:

Overview

Phase
Not Applicable
Status
Not yet recruiting
Sponsor
Dr Tanisha Mali
Enrollment
25
Locations
1
Primary Endpoint
1. Cervical Dystonia: Toronto Western Spasmodic

Overview

Brief Summary

Title

The Effect of Cervical Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation along with Pressure Biofeedback on improving Severity, Range of Motion and Quality of Life in patients with chronic Cervical Dystonia – a pre-post interventional study

Overview

This study investigates the combined effect of Cervical Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) and Pressure Biofeedback in patients with chronic Cervical Dystonia (CD), a neurological movement disorder characterized by involuntary muscle contractions in the neck, leading to abnormal postures, pain, reduced range of motion (ROM), and diminished quality of life (QoL).

Objectives

To assess whether the intervention improves:

  1. Severity of cervical dystonia

  2. Range of motion of the cervical spine

  3. Quality of life of affected individuals

Rationale

Current first-line treatments like Botulinum Toxin injections provide symptomatic relief but often leave residual disability. There is limited research on combining PNF with pressure biofeedback as a therapeutic alternative for CD.

Methodology

Design: Pre-post interventional study

Sample Size: 25 participants

Duration: 8 weeks - 3 sessions per week

Population: Adults aged 20 to 60 with chronic CD, diagnosed greater than 1 year, TWSTRS score more than 35, no BoNT in last 6 months

Tools Used:

  1. CD Severity Scale (CDSS) for severity

  2. Goniometer for ROM

  3. CDQoL-24 Questionnaire for quality of life

  4. TWSTRS for baseline inclusion

Intervention

PNF: Targeting cervical flexors, extensors, lateral flexors, and rotators using the Contract Relax Antagonist Contract (CRAC) technique

Pressure Biofeedback: Sub-occipital positioning of a pressure sensor to facilitate deep neck flexor activation and control

Data Analysis

Pre- and post-intervention data will be compared using Paired t-test or Wilcoxon Signed Rank Test depending on data normality.

p-value less than 0.05 considered significant.

Data analyzed using SPSS v29

Primary Hypothesis

Null Hypothesis (H0)

There will be no significant effect of Cervical Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation along with Pressure Biofeedback on severity, range of motion, and quality of life in patients with chronic Cervical Dystonia.

Alternative Hypothesis (H1)

There will be a significant effect of Cervical Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation along with Pressure Biofeedback on severity, range of motion, and quality of life in patients with chronic Cervical Dystonia.

Study Design

Study Type
Interventional
Allocation
Na
Masking
None

Eligibility Criteria

Ages
20.00 Year(s) to 60.00 Year(s) (—)
Sex
All

Inclusion Criteria

  • Individuals with chronic (1 year post symptoms) Cervical Dystonia.
  • Diagnosed with cervical dystonia by a physician.
  • Age group of 20-60 years
  • Both the genders
  • Individuals with Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale score of minimum
  • No history of Botulinum Toxin Injection taken in past 6 months.

Exclusion Criteria

  • Individuals with acute Cervical Dystonia.
  • Individuals persisting other cervical deformities along with cervical dystonia.
  • Participants who have taken Botulinum Toxin Injection in less than past 6 months span.

Outcomes

Primary Outcomes

1. Cervical Dystonia: Toronto Western Spasmodic

Time Frame: 1. baseline data: 1st day of treatment | 2. Final data: after 8 weeks of treatment which will be the result data.

Torticollis Rating Scale.

Time Frame: 1. baseline data: 1st day of treatment | 2. Final data: after 8 weeks of treatment which will be the result data.

2. Severity: Cervical Dystonia Severity Scale (CDSS)

Time Frame: 1. baseline data: 1st day of treatment | 2. Final data: after 8 weeks of treatment which will be the result data.

3. Range of Motion: Goniometry

Time Frame: 1. baseline data: 1st day of treatment | 2. Final data: after 8 weeks of treatment which will be the result data.

4. Quality of Life: Cervical Dystonia questionnaire 24

Time Frame: 1. baseline data: 1st day of treatment | 2. Final data: after 8 weeks of treatment which will be the result data.

(CDQ-24)

Time Frame: 1. baseline data: 1st day of treatment | 2. Final data: after 8 weeks of treatment which will be the result data.

Secondary Outcomes

No secondary outcomes reported

Investigators

Sponsor
Dr Tanisha Mali
Sponsor Class
Other [self]
Responsible Party
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigator

Dr Tanisha Mali

Dr. G. D. Pol Foundation, YMT College of Physiotherapy

Study Sites (1)

Loading locations...

Similar Trials