Blind versus Ultrasound-guided Radius Reduction STudy

Not Applicable

Completed

• Conditions: <p>Distal radius fracture</p>; Distal radial fracture, distal radius fracture, ultrasound, PoCUS, closed reduction; 10005944

• Registration Number: NL-OMON25424
• Lead Sponsor: MC

Brief Summary

This multicentre randomised controlled trial could not demonstrate that PoCUS guided reduction of distal radial fractures was associated with a lower number of reduction attempts or a lower proportion of patients with an indication for operative repair.

Detailed Description

Not available

Study Timeline

• Last Update Posted: 6 May 2024

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: Completed
• Sex: Not specified
• Target Recruitment: 211

Inclusion Criteria

|
Patiënten (=16 jaar) die zich op de SEH presenteren met een distale radiusfractuur (inclusief intra-articulaire fracturen of radiusfracturen in combinatie met een distale ulna fractuur) waarvoor repositie geïndiceerd is. |

Exclusion Criteria

• - Leeftijd <16 jaar

• - Open fracturen

• - Klinisch vastgestelde nieuwe neurovasculaire schade

• - Operatie indicatie gesteld op basis van de eerste röntgenfoto

• - Osteosynthese materiaal in situ bij aangedane pols

• - Letsel waardoor applicatie van echo gel niet mogelijk is

Study & Design

• Study Type: Interventional
• Study Design: Not specified

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
<p>A 50% reduction in repeated reduction attempts of distal radius fractures between the ultrasound guided group and the control group.</p>

Secondary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
<p>The difference between both groups in the number of patients that need reduction in operating theater, the difference in reduction time in ED between both groups.</p>