Airway Management in Thoracic Anesthesia in Italy

Completed

• Conditions: Mechanical Ventilation Complication
• Interventions: Device: DLT versus bronchial blockers

• Registration Number: NCT02361983
• Lead Sponsor: Azienda Ospedaliera S. Maria della Misericordia

Brief Summary

The aim of this study is to compare the success rate of lung isolation and time to accomplish a correct placement of the device between anesthetists with experience in thoracic anesthesia (defined as at least 4 years clinical practice experience as attending anesthetists in thoracic) and residents in training in thoracic anesthesia.

Detailed Description

The aim of this study is to compare the success rate of lung isolation and time to accomplish a correct placement of the device between anesthetists with experience in thoracic anesthesia (defined as at least 4 years clinical practice experience as attending anesthetists in thoracic) and residents in training in thoracic anesthesia.

A prospective randomized trial was designed. To check the optimal DLT (Broncho-Cath Covidien, Ireland, Dublin, Teleflex Medical, Athlone, Irelanad) and/or BB (Uniblocker, Phycon, Fuji, Japan Arndt Cohen Cook, Australia), placement a fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) was used. The lung collapse was assessed by surgeons.

Time from laringoscopy to the correct placement of the device, confirmed with FOB, was checked.

Data were analyzed with Student't Test and Chi-square test; p value \< 0.05 was considered to be significant.

Study Timeline

• Study Start: 2012-07
• Study First Submitted: 2012-12-03
• Primary Completion: 2013-11
• Study Completion: 2014-12
• Study First Submitted QC: 2015-02-07
• Study First Posted: 2015-02-12
• Status Verified: 2018-03
• Last Update Submitted: 2018-03-25
• Last Update Posted: 2018-03-27

Recruitment & Eligibility

• Status: COMPLETED
• Sex: All
• Target Recruitment: 2129

Inclusion Criteria

• patients who need one lung ventilation undergoing thoracic surgery

Exclusion Criteria

• age < 18 years old

Study & Design

• Study Type: OBSERVATIONAL
• Study Design: Not specified

Arm && Interventions

Group	Intervention	Description
DLT versus bronchial blockers	DLT versus bronchial blockers	double lumen tube versus bronchial blockers

Primary Outcome Measures

Name	Time	Method
DOUBLE LUMEN TUBE AND BRONCHIAL BLOCKER POSITIONING SUCCESS RATE: RESIDENTS vs. ATTENDING ANESTHETISTS.	11/19/2012	A prospective randomized trial was designed. To check the optimal DLT (Broncho-Cath Covidien, Ireland, Dublin, Teleflex Medical, Athlone, Irelanad) and/or BB (Uniblocker, Phycon, Fuji, Japan Arndt Cohen Cook, Australia), placement a fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) was used. The lung collapse was assessed by surgeons.; Time from laringoscopy to the correct placement of the device, confirmed with FOB, was checked.; Data were analyzed with Student't Test and Chi-square test; p value \< 0.05 was considered to be significant.

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Department of Anesthesia and Intensive Care; 🇮🇹 Udine, Udine/Italy, Italy