跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04189185
NCT04189185Unknown不适用

Suture Fixation Versus Tension Band Wiring of Simple Displaced Olecranon Fractures

Aalborg University Hospital2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 88 人开始时间: 2019年12月5日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
88
试验地点
2
主要终点
Re-operation

研究概览

简要总结

Simple displaced olecranon fractures are most often treated with tension band wiring. This is an effective treatment, but the risk of subsequent re-operation is high. The investigators propose open reduction and internal fixation with a strong suture, thus reducing the risk of re-operation significantly.

详细描述

Background Olecranon fractures are frequent with an incidence of 11.5 per 100.000 people per year. Olecranon fractures are classified according to the Mayo classification in three groups. Type 1A and B are treated conservatively, while comminute fractures of type Mayo 2B and 3B are treated with plate osteosynthesis.

The most common type is a simple two part fracture, Mayo type 2A, which represents 74% of all olecranon fractures. The typical treatment of Mayo type 2A fractures is osteosynthesis using k-wires and tension band wiring. This provides adequate fracture healing and good functional results. The use of plate osteosynthesis for Mayo type 2A fractures does not provide functional or health economic benefits compared with operation with tension band wiring.

Common for both techniques is a high risk of re-operation due to delayed healing of the surgical wound, and complications arising from the implanted material.

Recently, new techniques for Mayo type 2A fractures have been described, in which no metal is implanted. Osteosynthesis is achieved with strong sutures. These techniques have been shown to reduce the high risk of complications leading to re-operation without effecting the functional outcome or fracture healing rate.

Hypothesis The investigators hypothesize that suture fixation of Mayo type 2A fractures will decrease the risk of re-operation and provide equal functional outcome compared with tension band wiring.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

An envelope deciding the treatment modality is drawn while the patient is anesthetized. Post operative follow-up is performed by blinded assessors. The treatment will be revealed after one year, or if the patient is excluded from the study.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 75 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Olecranon fracture, Mayo Type 2A

排除标准

  • Bilateral upper extremity fracture
  • Open fracture
  • Neurovascular affection
  • Injury to ligament, dislocation or subluxation
  • Additional upper extremity fracture
  • Pathological fracture
  • Previous elbow issue
  • Fracture more than 14 days old
  • Substance abuse
  • medical contraindication for surgery
  • Previous fracture to the same elbow

结局指标

主要结局

Re-operation

时间窗: 1 year

The rate of re-operation

次要结局

  • Range of motion(1 year)
  • Rate of complications(1 year)
  • Sick days(1 year)
  • The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Score(1 year)
  • European Quality of life - 5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) questionnaire(1 year)
  • Non-union(6 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Andreas Haubjerg Qvist

MD, Principal investigator

Aalborg University Hospital

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验