MedPath

Core Gel Study of the Safety and Effectiveness of Mentor Round Low Bleed Silicone Gel-filled Mammary Prostheses

Phase 3
Completed
Conditions
Breast Reconstruction
Breast Augmentation
Breast Revision
Interventions
Device: Mentor Round Low Bleed Gel-filled Mammary Protheses, both Siltex and Smooth Surface
Registration Number
NCT00753922
Lead Sponsor
Mentor Worldwide, LLC
Brief Summary

The Core Gel Study is designed to demonstrate safety and effectiveness of Mentor's Round Low-Bleed Silicone Gel-filled Mammary Prostheses in women who are undergoing primary augmentation, primary reconstruction, or revision. Safety information on the rate of capsular contracture, rupture, and infection will be collected, and used to help determine device safety.

Approximately 1000 patients at centers across the United States will be enrolled in this research study. These patients will be implanted with silicone breast prostheses and monitored for 10 years to collect information on risks associated with the implant surgery as well as changes in the way these patients feel about themselves.

Detailed Description

Silicone gel-filled breast implants were introduced in the early sixties and were in wide-scale distribution by the time the Medical Device Amendments to the Food Drug and Cosmetic Act was passed in 1976. In 1983, gel-filled breast implants were designated as Class III devices requiring premarket approval. In May 1990, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) published a proposed request (515(b)) for Premarket Approval Applications (PMA) and in April 1991 published the final request. This final publication put manufacturers of gel-filled breast implants on notice that for continued marketing of gel-filled breast implants, a PMA was due to FDA in 90 days from the final publication date.

A premarket approval (PMA) for the Mentor gel-filled breast implants was filed with the FDA in July 1991. At the FDA General and Plastic Surgery Advisory Committee meeting in November 1991, the committee recommended the submission of additional information to establish the safety and effectiveness of gel-filled breast implants.

In January 1992, the FDA Commissioner announced a voluntary moratorium of the sale of gel-filled breast implants to allow the advisory panel time to assess additional information. In April 1992, the moratorium was lifted but only for reconstruction and revision patients. Every patient implanted had to be part of an adjunct study, and had to be offered participation in a registry of gel-filled breast implant patients. In order to be implanted with gel-filled implants for augmentation, women had to be enrolled in a core clinical study.

The objective of this study is to determine the safety and effectiveness of the smooth and textured surface Mentor Round Low-Bleed Silicone Gel-filled Mammary Prostheses in women who are undergoing primary breast augmentation, primary breast reconstruction or revision.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
COMPLETED
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
1008
Inclusion Criteria
  • Subject is Genetic female and at least 18 years old
  • A candidate for:
  • Primary breast augmentation (for post-lactational mammary involution or general breast enlargement)
  • Primary breast reconstruction (for cancer, trauma, surgical loss of breast or congenital deformity)
  • Revision surgery (previous augmentation or reconstruction with silicone-filled or saline-filled implants)
  • Signs the Informed Consent
  • Agrees to follow the procedures for explant analysis
  • Agrees to comply with follow-up procedures, including returning for all follow-up visits
Exclusion Criteria
  • Patient is pregnant
  • Has nursed a child within three months of study enrollment
  • Been implanted with any silicone implant other than breast implants (e.g. silicone artificial joints or facial implants)
  • Confirmed diagnosis of the following rheumatic diseases or syndromes: SLE, Sjogren's syndrome, scleroderma, polymyositis, or any connective tissue disorder, rheumatoid arthritis, crystalline arthritis, infections arthritis, spondylarthropathies, any other inflammatory arthritis, osteoarthritis, fibromyalgia, or chronic fatigue syndrome
  • Currently has a condition that could compromise or complicate wound healing (except reconstruction patients)
  • Patient in Augmentation cohort and has diagnosis of active cancer of any type
  • Infection or abscess anywhere in the body
  • Demonstrates tissue characteristics which are clinically incompatible with implant (e.g. tissue damage resulting from radiation, inadequate tissue, or compromised vascularity)
  • Possesses any condition, or is under treatment for any condition which, in the opinion of the investigator and/or consulting physicians(s), may constitute an unwarranted surgical risk
  • Anatomic or physiologic abnormality which could lead to significant postoperative adverse events
  • Demonstrates characteristics that are unrealistic/unreasonable with the risks involved with the surgical procedure
  • Premalignant breast disease without a subcutaneous mastectomy
  • Untreated or inappropriately treated breast malignancy, without mastectomy
  • Implanted metal or metal devices, history of claustrophobia or other condition that would make a MRI scan prohibitive

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
PARALLEL
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Primary AugmentationMentor Round Low Bleed Gel-filled Mammary Protheses, both Siltex and Smooth SurfaceThe Augmentation cohort will include patients who have post-lactational mammary involution or wish general breast enlargement.
Primary ReconstructionMentor Round Low Bleed Gel-filled Mammary Protheses, both Siltex and Smooth SurfaceThe Reconstruction cohort will include patients with loss of breast due to mastectomy or with deformities secondary to disease, malignancy, trauma, and congenital deformity. Congenital deformities will include deformities of the breast itself as well as skeletal abnormalities reflected in breast deformity or asymmetry.
Revison AugmentationMentor Round Low Bleed Gel-filled Mammary Protheses, both Siltex and Smooth SurfacePatients in this cohort will have had previous breast augmentation with silicone or saline filled implants and are having a revision surgery to correct or improve the result of any previous breast augmentation surgery.
Revision ReconstructionMentor Round Low Bleed Gel-filled Mammary Protheses, both Siltex and Smooth SurfacePatients in this cohort will have had previous breast reconstruction with silicone or saline filled implants and are having a revision surgery to correct or improve the result of any previous breast reconstruction surgery.
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
10-Year Kaplan-Meier Estimated Cumulative Incidence Rate of Occurrence of Any Reoperation10 years

Time of occurrence calculated as the number of days from the date of the implant procedure to the onset date of the event. Patients were censored as of the date of their last office visit, the 120 month time point, or the date of explantation of all initial study devices, whichever was earliest.

Overall Mean Change in Circumferential Chest SizeChange from baseline to 10 years post-baseline

Change in Chest Size was calculated by subtracting the chest circumference prior to surgery from the chest circumference measured at the end of the study

10-Year Kaplan-Meier Estimated Cumulative Incidence Rate of Occurrence of Baker III, IV Capsular Contracture10 Years

Baker III was identified as "firm with visible distortion" and Baker IV was identified as "obvious spherical distortion". Time of occurrence calculated as the number of days from the date of the implant procedure to the onset date of the event. Patients were censored as of the date of their last office visit, the 120 month time point, or the date of explantation of all initial study devices, whichever was earliest.

10-Year Kaplan-Meier Estimated Cumulative Incidence Rate of Occurrence of Infection10 Years

Time of occurrence calculated as the number of days from the date of the implant procedure to the onset date of the event. Patients were censored as of the date of their last office visit, the 120 month time point, or the date of explantation of all initial study devices, whichever was earliest.

10-Year Kaplan-Meier Estimated Cumulative Incidence Rate of Occurrence of Explantation With or Without Replacement10 Years

Time of occurrence calculated as the number of days from the date of the implant procedure to the onset date of the event. Patients were censored as of the date of their last office visit, the 120 month time point, or the date of explantation of all initial study devices, whichever was earliest.

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Mentor Worldwide, LLC

🇺🇸

Santa Barbara, California, United States

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath