MedPath

Adaptive Radiotherapy in Patients With Gynecological Tumors

Not Applicable
Recruiting
Conditions
Gynecological Tumor
Radiation
Curative Treatment
Optimization
Image Guided Radiotherapy
Adaptive Radiotherapy
Adaptive Radiation Therapy
Cervical Carcinoma
Interventions
Radiation: Adaptive Radiotherapy
Registration Number
NCT06230549
Lead Sponsor
University Hospital, Essen
Brief Summary

Prospective randomized evaluation of adaptive radiotherapy in the definitive radiotherapy of locally advanced gynecologic carcinoma (e.g. cervical carcinoma, endometrial carcinoma, vaginal carcinoma), in the postoperative situation or first series of external beam radiotherapy and in patients in whom radical surgery or HDR brachytherapy as dose boost is not an option.

Detailed Description

Online-adaptive radiotherapy (ART) makes it possible to adapt the dose distribution to the anatomical changes online immediately before each radiation fraction. Adaptive radiotherapy is a further development of image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT), which is now standard in radiotherapy. Here, a cone-beam CT (CBCT) is also performed at the beginning of each fraction, which is used to position the patients in relation to the radiation field arrangement of the initial radiation plan approved for the series. In contrast to ART, with IGRT the radiation plan cannot be adapted to deformations in the body from radiation fraction to radiation fraction, e.g. due to different rectum and bladder fillings.

In ART mode, the online adaptive treatment plan for the current treatment is then selected and approved by the specialist online onboard in all cases in which the current target volume for the tumor expansion is not sufficiently covered by the initial treatment plan pre-planned for the series with its planned tolerances, or surrounding normal tissue is exposed too much. If the ART plan does not show any clear dosimetric advantages over the reference plan, especially if the initial plan covers the target volume of the day well, there are no dose increases and the normal tissues are spared as intended, the initial radiation plan from the planning CT can also be used as in IGRT. The aim of this study is to treat at least 15 patients with locally advanced gynecological carcinoma (mainly cervical carcinoma, endometrial carcinoma, vaginal carcinoma), who are to receive definitive radiotherapy at the Department for Radiotherapy at the University Hospital Essen, in ART mode on the Ethos therapy device over an initial 10 radiation fractions. The dose distribution is always compared with the adaptive and the initial plan for the radiation series on the anatomy of the day by the specialist and medical physics expert. The aim of this study is to prospectively investigate what percentage of patients benefit from ART when using standard PTV margins and how to recognize the corresponding patients early in the series. Secondarily, it will be investigated in what proportion of patients the risk organ burden and the safety margins around the clinical target volume can be reduced with ART compared to IGRT and how large this reduction can be.

The EORTC and CTC AE toxicitiy scales and further assessment scales will be evaluated in order to quantify objective and subjective side effects.

Recruitment & Eligibility

Status
RECRUITING
Sex
Female
Target Recruitment
30
Inclusion Criteria

ECOG 0-1 confirmation by histophatology MR of the pelvis staging

Exclusion Criteria

Recurrent disease Prior Radiotherapy in pelvic region stage pM1 or cM1

Study & Design

Study Type
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Design
CROSSOVER
Arm && Interventions
GroupInterventionDescription
Standard conventional Treatment Arm, IGRTAdaptive RadiotherapyStandard conventional Treatment Arm, IGRT
Interventional ArmAdaptive RadiotherapyAdaptive Radiotherapy
Primary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Lymph-Edema grade2 weeks to 5 years

Lymph-Edema, EORTC CTC-AE ( (Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)) 1-3, \[score 1: nearly no toxicity, asymptomatic changes - score 3: worst outcome, severe symptoms; limiting self care ADL\]

Skin Toxicity2 weeks to 5 years

Skin, EORTC CTC-AE (Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)) 1-5, \[score 1: nearly no toxicity, asymptomatic changes - score 5: worst outcome (death)\]

Rectal Toxicity2 weeks to 5 years

Rectum, EORTC CTC-AE (Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)) 1-5, \[score 1: nearly no toxicity, asymptomatic changes - score 5: worst outcome (death)\]

Bladder Toxicity2 weeks to 5 years

Bladder, EORTC CTC-AE (Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) of the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)) 1-5, \[score 1: nearly no toxicity, asymptomatic changes - score 5: worst outcome (death)\]

Secondary Outcome Measures
NameTimeMethod
Overall Survival5 years

Overall Survival

Progression Free Survival5 years

Progression Free Survival

Trial Locations

Locations (1)

Department for Radiotherapy, University Hospital Essen, National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) West

🇩🇪

Essen, Germany / NRW, Germany

© Copyright 2025. All Rights Reserved by MedPath